Skip to content
#software testing Open access

Speed vs Structure: Building Reproducible AI Workflows with the UCL Unified AI Research Platform

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Scientific Computing and Data Management

Abstract

Event Type Walkthrough Abstract In this 30-minute walk-through, we demonstrate how AI model development can be effectively balanced between rapid experimentation and robust, reproducible software engineering practices using Unified AI, UCL’s in-house Kubernetes-based research platform. Through an end-to-end example using open-access datasets to train a foundational model for synthetic image generation (https://github.com/xfetus/fetal-ultrasound-edm2), we present two complementary workflows. First, we demonstrate rapid prototyping using Kubeflow-TrainerCommand with the notebook training-edm2-model-scratch-volume.ipynb, where dependencies are installed and training is executed directly in a scratch volume. This enables fast iteration and exploratory development, allowing researchers to quickly validate ideas and test modelling assumptions with minimal setup. We then move to a structured, production-oriented workflow using training-edm2-model-ghcr.ipynb. Here, containerised environments and a central GitHub image registry manage code and dependencies, with execution still handled via Kubeflow-TrainerCommand. This highlights how the same task can support reproducibility, version control, scalability, and long-term maintainability. We highlight trade-offs between speed and robustness in real-world AI workflows. The session is reproducible for UCL researchers with Unified AI accounts and useful for external participants exploring practical adoption. It is designed to encourage discussion before and after the event, support knowledge exchange, and foster future collaboration. We conclude by reflecting on broader good practice, including how institutional platforms such as Unified AI, currently an in-house UCL platform requiring UCL ID credentials, can reduce reliance on external vendors, improve cost efficiency, and support more consistent and reproducible research across teams. This also creates opportunities for cross-faculty collaboration and discussion of how similar approaches are being adopted elsewhere. Prerequisites This content is aimed at Research Software Engineers, data scientists and data stewards of all levels, from beginners to experts, who are interested in AI model development. For those at beginner to intermediate level, some familiarity with GitHub workflows and Python environments would be useful, particularly package management for libraries such as PyTorch, and the drivers relevant to your setup. For more experienced attendees, prior exposure to Kubernetes will help: running kubectl commands, debugging Docker images, and configuring your GitHub account accordingly. If you'd like to replicate the workflows at your own institution, some Kubernetes dependencies will also be needed. To prototype model development locally, you'll need a laptop with an NVIDIA GPU. This lets you run local images and a few epochs of the model to confirm the workflow runs end to end, before scaling up to an A100 or H100 via Kubernetes. Outcomes For Research Software Engineers (RSEs), the key benefits of this session include: (1) developing, strengthening, and exploring new skills across the end-to-end lifecycle of AI model development; (2) gaining a deeper understanding of real-world requirements, constraints, and domain-specific needs; (3) learning from practical case studies to better support collaborative development, manage technical teams, and address common scaling and adoption challenges in AI systems. Participants will also be invited to join a growing community network through GitHub and Etherpad-based collaboration spaces. These platforms will be used to share resources, continue discussions beyond the session, and contribute to an evolving set of community-driven outputs. This includes opportunities to shape future activities such as hackathons, workshops, training sessions, and other collaborative events focused on advancing sustainable AI engineering practices. In-Person or Online Delivery Hybrid (Both In-Person and Online Presenters) Acknowledgements We acknowledge UCL Unified AI Services (UAIServices@UCL) for providing an in-house platform supporting AI model development for researchers across UCL. We also acknowledge the agile delivery support provided by Dorothy Chung.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Jun 2008

The impact of agile practices on communication in software development

The study shows that agile practices improve both informal and formal communication, but indicates that, in larger development situations involving multiple external stakeholders, a mismatch of adequate communication mechanisms can sometimes even hinder the communication.

M. Pikkarainen, Jukka Haikara, O. Salo et al. · 401 citations · ⚡48
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Review Mar 2008

Agile methods in European embedded software development organisations: a survey on the actual use and usefulness of Extreme Programming and Scrum

The results show that the embedded industry has been able to apply agile methods in its development processes and that the appreciation of the agile methods and their individual practices appears to increase once adopted and applied in practice.

O. Salo, P. Abrahamsson · 238 citations · ⚡9
#computer vision Open access Jul 2017

What happens when software developers are (un)happy

Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 236 citations · ⚡13
#computer vision Open access Oct 2004

Mobile-D: an agile approach for mobile application development

The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.

P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al. · 225 citations · ⚡18

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.