Jul 2026· International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces· pp. 1-15· 1 citation· 57 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This work examines how mental models of images are built and pruned through dialogue between BVI users and an AI-powered conversational visual assistant, and derives prompt guidelines for layered descriptions, subject-aware defaults and adaptive follow-up suggestions.
Abstract
Digital image-centric platforms create new barriers for blind and visually impaired (BVI) people. We examine how mental models of images are built and pruned through dialogue between BVI users and an AI-powered conversational visual assistant. In a study with 10 BVI participants, we collected 30 voice-based conversations about images showing widely salient objects, allowing unrestricted follow-up questions from users. Exploratory results: AI misses critical details in initial captions; Step-wise analysis shows a common trajectory: users start with a compact scene overview, then request category-specific details (e.g. social cues for people, environmental and functional context for animals and vehicles). Comparing AI-assistant outputs with participants’ later verbal reconstructions reveals both accumulation and pruning: in total, correctly reflected claims increase from 56 to 191 while omitted claims rise from 7 to 121, and mental models similarity scores leveled around 61–63% after Step 4. We derive prompt guidelines for layered descriptions, subject-aware defaults and adaptive follow-up suggestions.
When strong multimodal models are widely available, progress requires new scientific methodologies beyond benchmark scores---using models as instruments for understanding behavior. We address this by asking: can we use large vision-language models (LVLMs) as experimental instruments for studying their own failure dynam...
Zhi-Peng Zhao, Wen-Xu Wang, Peishun Liu et al.· 0 citations
HUG-VIS, a unified benchmark for Human-centered Understanding and Generation in Visual Intelligence, contains 8,400 seated half-body videos of 30 professional actors, each performing the same 280 emotion-action-prompt assignments under a controlled Mandarin studio protocol, with synchronized video, audio, text, and alp...
Fei Ma, Ze-Bang Cheng, Ming-Hui Li et al.· 0 citations
It is found that visual presentation is a central factor that determines whether VLM benchmarks measure grounded perception, downstream reasoning, or a mixture of both, and gains are closely tied to reductions in grounding-related errors, while rule reasoning remains comparatively challenging.
Lars Benedikt Kaesberg, Tianyu Yang, F. Wunderlich et al.· 0 citations
While multimodal AI holds strong potential to support the blind and visually impaired (BVI), current systems often fail to provide meaningful assistance. In this paper, we analyse online videos created by BVI content creators to understand how assistance unfolds in practice. Across two studies, we examine videos of BVI...
Joel Wester, Damien Rudaz, Muhammad Haris Khan et al.· Proceedings of the 14th Nord...· 0 citations
Wearables powered by computer vision and large language models (LLMs) such as AI glasses are increasingly marketed as assistive technology for blind and low vision people. However, HCI scholarship attending to AI-powered image descriptions draws attention to erroneous outputs, privacy issues, and the need to design aut...
B. Carreras, Damien Rudaz, Brian L. Due et al.· Proceedings of the 14th Nord...· 0 citations
Previous research suggests that imagery processes grounded in visual experience are crucial for narrative
comprehension, particularly for creating mental models of story events. Visual impairments offer a unique lens to explore this
issue, but research is limited. This pilot study investigates the role of visual pe...
A. Chiera, Valentina Deriu, Daniela Altavilla et al.· Pragmatics & Cognition· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.