HUG-VIS, a unified benchmark for Human-centered Understanding and Generation in Visual Intelligence, contains 8,400 seated half-body videos of 30 professional actors, each performing the same 280 emotion-action-prompt assignments under a controlled Mandarin studio protocol, with synchronized video, audio, text, and alpha mattes.
Abstract
Visual intelligence seeks to perceive, interpret, and synthesize the visual world and is central to modern computer vision. Human-centered visual intelligence is especially demanding because it studies people as expressive, socially situated subjects whose meaning is rarely conveyed by appearance alone. It couples vision with audio and language across four representative tasks: human emotion recognition, human video generation, human voice cloning, and human video matting. Yet existing resources remain task-specific, providing modalities and annotations for individual problems rather than a shared foundation coordinating understanding and generation. This limits multimodal signal use and broader research. We address this gap with HUG-VIS, a unified benchmark for Human-centered Understanding and Generation in Visual Intelligence. It contains 8,400 seated half-body videos of 30 professional actors, each performing the same 280 emotion-action-prompt assignments under a controlled Mandarin studio protocol, with synchronized video, audio, text, and alpha mattes. We evaluate diverse open- and closed-source models across the four tasks under a unified zero-shot protocol using automatic metrics, criterion-specific mean opinion scores, and multiple cross-task analyses. Results show that (i) linguistic content dominates current emotion recognition, while purely visual affect recognition is weakest; (ii) in video generation and voice cloning, automatic metrics and human judgment agree overall but differ in their top rankings, requiring joint reporting; (iii) boundary fidelity under motion is the main remaining obstacle for human matting; and (iv) task difficulty varies across emotions, models, and metrics, with notable cross-task correlations. The dataset and results are available at https://github.com/GML-MMGroup/HUG-VIS.
This survey presents a critical review of VLMs for egocentric video understanding, tracing the progression from conventional recognition architectures to multimodal foundation models and embodied systems, and examines how first-person perception and multimodal foundation models support wearable assistance, robot skill learning, human-to-robot transfer, and embodied decision making.
Visually impaired individuals (VIIs) encounter significant daily challenges due to limited access to visual information. Although Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive results on general vision and language tasks, their practical utility in real-world blind assistance still remains largely underexplored. To fill this gap, we introduce VIABench, a comprehensive video benchmark specifically designed to evaluate MLLMs in Visually Impaired Assistance scenarios using first-person videos recorded or shared by VIIs themselves. VIABench defines three core tasks, each targeting a distinct requirement in visual assistance. Proactive Reminder: Assesses the model's ability to interpret ongoing video content while proactively anticipating and verbally describing upcoming navigation-critical events; Visual Question Answering (VQA): Evaluates the model's capacity to answer user-posed questions about the environment or objects within the video; Vision-Guided Interaction: Tests context-aware reasoning to accomplish intentional interactions between user and environment. To ensure a robust and fair evaluation, we propose a rigorous benchmarking pipeline that supports both online (real-time) and offline settings. Our experiments demonstrate that current MLLMs still struggle to deliver comprehensive support for VIIs, especially in the Proactive Reminder task, which demands accurate anticipation and real-time responsiveness. We hope VIABench will drive future research toward developing customized MLLMs for real-world assistance, ultimately improving navigation and interaction experiences for visually impaired individuals. Code and data will be released at https://github.com/MCG-NJU/VIABench.
Yunfeng Liu, Yuandong Yang, Jiarui Han et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
VGAU-Diag is introduced, a fine-grained evaluation framework for vision generation-assisted understanding that stratifies samples by difficulty, enables unified evaluation of multiple reasoning paradigms, and uses Oracle-Ass Reference Protocols.
Yubo Zhu, Zhehan Kan, Jing-Yi Yang et al.· 1 citation
Other-initiated Self-repair, or in short Other-initiated Repair (OIR), is an essential mechanism in conversational interaction, whereby a recipient signals a problem in speaking, hearing, or understanding, prompting the previous speaker to resolve it. In the case of conversational agents, it is essential to accurately identify these repair initiation strategies to address communication breakdowns efficiently. While conversational analysis studies have shown that OIR initiation is accompanied by both verbal and non-verbal signals such as gaze shifts, facial expressions, body postures, and hand gestures, existing computational approaches rely mainly on text and audio. This paper introduces a novel multimodal model for OIR detection and classification, incorporating a set of visual features drawn from conversation analysis. We evaluate our approach on two corpora with distinct languages and interaction settings. Results demonstrate that visual information consistently improves performance over text and audio baselines, and provide insights into cross-modal feature contributions across two corpora.
Anh Ngo, Nicolas Rollet, C. Pelachaud et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Recent vision-language models demonstrate impressive general visual understanding, yet their art interpretation remains shallow: they describe surface content but struggle with formal analysis, grounded historical interpretation, or affective characterization. We argue this is not only a model but also a dataset limitation. Existing art datasets are single perspective resources, where no dataset provides narrative, formal, emotional, and historical perspectives simultaneously for the same artworks. We introduce MMArt, a large-scale dataset of 74,234 WikiArt paintings, each annotated with four independently annotated perspectives plus a harmonized unified caption, produced by specialized vision-language models or human annotation and validated through complementary quality evaluations. Two complementarity analyses establish that perspectives encode genuinely distinct information. A generative analysis shows that formal analysis descriptions best preserve compositional style, and historical descriptions carry strong affective signal in reconstructed images. A discriminative retrieval analysis reveals task-asymmetry: narrative descriptions drive retrieval (R@1 = 44.0%), while formal descriptions, strongest for reconstruction, are nearly nondiscriminative at retrieval scale (R@1 = 7.8%). Leave-one-out analysis further confirms that historical descriptions are the least replaceable perspective across both tasks. Together, the two analyses establish that no single perspective suffices for all tasks, directly motivating MMArt multi-perspective design. The dataset, code, and additional information are available at https://shuaiwang97.github.io/MMArt/.
Shuai Wang, Wangyuan Ding, Yixian Shen et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
