JEPA Policy is introduced, a diffusion-free framework that uses the action chunk and its observed future representation as paired training targets as paired training targets and supports paired future-representation supervision supervision as a practical approach to low-latency visuomotor imitation without iterative generative sampling.
Abstract
Standard behavior cloning supervises actions without explicitly constraining the future representation paired with each demonstrated action chunk. We introduce JEPA Policy, a diffusion-free framework that uses the action chunk and its observed future representation as paired training targets. Action and future-representation tokens interact in a shared Transformer and are refined through two forward passes. Future prediction can therefore shape the representation used to generate actions. Dual-branch and gradient-routing controls attribute the gain to this shared topology rather than to an auxiliary prediction head alone. Across nine simulated tasks, JEPA Policy improves mean success over the action-only MIP baseline and outperforms Diffusion Policy under the evaluated configurations, while adding 0.29 ms to MIP's model latency. A five-task, 630-episode physical-robot study produces the same pooled ranking. Further audits find no complete representation collapse under action supervision and identify a task-conditioned failure-ranking signal in future-prediction error. These results support paired future-representation supervision as a practical approach to low-latency visuomotor imitation without iterative generative sampling.
Generative action models based on diffusion and flow matching have been increasingly adopted in vision-language-action (VLA) policies for their ability to capture diverse behaviors, including multiple valid action sequences under the same observation and instruction. Their iterative sampling procedures, however, requir...
Lilika Makabe, Heecheol Kim, Yasuyuki Matsushita· 0 citations
Cascade world-action models (WAMs) use predicted visual futures to condition robot actions, but inherit costly iterative inference from diffusion-pretrained experts. We ask what a single-step predicted future must preserve to support accurate single-step action prediction. In the evaluated WAM, resampling video noise h...
Shao-Yi Zheng, Zhong-Tao Jiang, Yue Peng et al.· 0 citations
Every valid trajectory can teach what physically happened, while the actor is deployed only under the condition associated with relatively better actions, in \method, a direct world-action policy that combines outcome-agnostic predictive learning with outcome-aware policy improvement.
Bo-Tong Zhao, Fangjie Yu, Tim Yu et al.· 0 citations
World-Action Models (WAMs) couple action generation with predictions of how physical interactions unfold. However, current post-deployment learning paradigms typically improve behavior without requiring better world predictions. Especially in dexterous manipulation, small execution errors can compound in high-dimension...
Xiang-Cheng Zhan, Zi-Rui Chen, Yi-Chen Zhao et al.· 1 citation
Joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPAs) learn compact latent world models without pixel reconstruction. Existing JEPA pipelines typically train visual representations and action-conditioned dynamics before adding a control policy or solver. We introduce LeWAM, an end-to-end JEPA for control with: (1) a joint t...
Minghao Fu, Tavis Siebert, Eryk Halicki et al.· 0 citations
World action models (WAMs) predict actions and future observations, typically from a reconstruction-based representation that carries noisy, redundant information which can complicate downstream predictions. We introduce LeWAM, a bidirectional transformer for forward, backward, inverse dynamics and policy prediction, o...
Shashank Hegde, Alexander Popov, Elie Aljalbout et al.· 2 citations