Skip to content

AI-DRIVEN ADMISSION SYSTEMS AND THEIR IMPACT ON ADMISSION INTAKE AND INSTITUTIONAL DIVERSITY: A REVIEW

Sep 2026

Abstract

With AI quickly making its way into higher education, many scholars are reevaluating how it decides the admissions. A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature published during 2019 and 2025 throws light to the state of knowledge in relation to AI-led admission systems the details of operational architectures and documented impacts on volume of admission intakes and diversity of institution. Drawing on research published in Scopus and in Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) classified journals, the review collates evidence on four linked themes (1) An adoption and functional architecture of AI admissions systems; (2) Predictive analytics and machine learning models for helping run the function of enrolment management; (3) Algorithmic bias with differential impact on racial, gender and socio-economic groups; and (4) Ethical and regulatory frameworks for using AI for admissions. The figures show that AI engines may increase throughput efficiency, reduce processing cost, increase predictive accuracy. But if historical data collects bias, then it may lead to reinforcement of same. Models that benchmark against historical enrolment norms focus on past limiting biases which aggravate the harm of Black, Hispanic, first-generation and low-income students. Academics studying Fairness, Accountability Transparency and Ethics (FATE) are constructing a normative vocabulary for reform. However, there’s a gap between the anticipations of policies and the technical implementation of these policies. A research agenda and recommendations for institutional policies to maximize alignment between equity-centred goals and AI-driven admission in higher education concludes our review.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.