Skip to content

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Comparative performance of artificial intelligence chatbots in patient education for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: quality, transparency and readability

Although some models provided comparatively stronger patient education, none consistently produced sufficiently accessible information on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, and these tools may supplement, but should not replace, individualized counseling by urologists and multidisciplinary prostate cancer teams.

Yang Liu, Rong-Kang Li, Peng Yu et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Evaluating the Accuracy of ChatGPT-4o in Addressing Complex Clinical Questions Based on NCCN Guidelines for Rectal Adenocarcinoma.

ChatGPT-4o demonstrates high concordance with NCCN rectal cancer guidelines across all evaluated clinical domains with notable improvement over prior ChatGPT iterations evaluated by this group.

Ryan J Meyer, Tamir E. Bresler, Kevin Palmer et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

ChatGPT-4o as a decision-support tool in a urological tumour board: a prospective evaluation.

Final recommendation concordance did not meet the protocol-defined benchmark, ChatGPT-4o never altered an MTB decision, and clinically relevant errors occurred even among highly concordant outputs, showing that concordance alone does not guarantee safety.

J. De la Torre-Trillo, A. Munuera, M. D. Ureña et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Evaluating AI-generated patient education materials for endometrial cancer surgery: a comparative analysis of response quality, reliability, and readability between ChatGPT and DeepSeek models

DeepSeek demonstrates a significant advantage in information reliability, particularly excelling in postoperative and follow-up management content, and ChatGPT shows a slight edge in the readability of surgical planning sections.

Ling Tian, Long-Yue Tang, Ming-Tao Yang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.