Aug 2026· Clinical and Translational Oncology· 0 citations· 15 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Final recommendation concordance did not meet the protocol-defined benchmark, ChatGPT-4o never altered an MTB decision, and clinically relevant errors occurred even among highly concordant outputs, showing that concordance alone does not guarantee safety.
ChatGPT-4o demonstrates high concordance with NCCN rectal cancer guidelines across all evaluated clinical domains with notable improvement over prior ChatGPT iterations evaluated by this group.
Ryan J Meyer, Tamir E. Bresler, Kevin Palmer et al.· Journal of Surgical Oncology· 0 citations
The evaluated LLMs showed high concordance with EAU 2026 first-line treatment recommendations for ureteral stones, and Concordance was complete in non–priority-sensitive scenarios requiring URS prioritization.
E. D. Demirkıran· Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal Univ...· 0 citations
ChatGPT-4o emerged as the most reliable model for andrology-related questions, providing responses that are were highly consistent with current clinical guidelines, suggesting that error-awareness mechanisms in large language models have the potential for further refinement.
U. Uysal, E. Alma, A. Altunkol et al.· BMC Urology· 0 citations
The EAU Guidelines Bot showed excellent accuracy, completeness, and clarity when applied to neuro-urology guideline-based questions, and was comparable to that of ChatGPT 5.5, with both systems providing highly accurate guideline-concordant responses.
S. De Cillis, Riccardo Lombardo, D. Amparore et al.· European Urology Focus· 0 citations
It is suggested that ChatGPT may align more closely with nephrology fellows’ decision-making than with senior nephrologists’ judgments, and may have potential as an educational tool for trainees, encouraging systematic evaluation of HD indications and structured clinical reasoning.
Esin Avsar Kucukkurt, Feyza Bora, H. Sozel et al.· Frontiers in Medicine· 0 citations