The Bayes factor (BF) is a central tool in Bayesian hypothesis testing and model selection, yet its practical use is often challenged. Classical BFs depend heavily on prior specification, cannot be applied with improper priors, and are typically interpreted through arbitrary evidence scales. Moreover, they fail to capture uncertainty inherent in the data, leading to an analogy with frequentist p-values, and primarily reflect prior-predictive rather than posterior-predictive performance. We introduce the stochastic Bayes factor (SBF), a new framework that extends the BF by explicitly incorporating uncertainty via replicated data. Formally, the SBF is defined as a push-forward measure transferring the BF from the observed data space to that of replications. This approach generalizes previous calibration proposals, while emphasizing posterior-predictive replication as a robust alternative. We establish key theoretical properties, including model consistency, compatibility and dominance, ensuring that SBFs preserve desirable Bayesian guarantees. An algorithmic routine is then proposed to operationalize the SBF, guiding model discrimination in a principled way while naturally providing model calibration. Simulation studies and real applications confirm that the SBF offers improved robustness and predictive reliability compared to the classical BF, by providing a valuable tool for model comparison.
Bayesian contextual optimization (BCO) is proposed, a framework that maintains a Gibbs posterior over the parameter space that weights candidate models by their empirical decision quality rather than statistical fit, thereby avoiding commitment to a potentially misspecified likelihood while encoding the full distributi...
Zhuo-Jun Xie, Adam F. Abdin, Yi-Ping Fang· 0 citations
We investigate Empirical Bayes (EB) methods in the context of compound adaptive experiments, where the arm distribution in each experiment follows a normal distribution with an unknown mean that we seek to estimate. There are two main EB strategies: $g$-modeling, which estimates the prior by maximizing the marginal lik...
Karun Adusumilli, Jia-Ying Gu, J. Tao· 0 citations
In this work, we revisit estimation and variable selection in sparse Gaussian regression, possibly under affine constraints. We adopt a middle-ground approach between optimisation and fully hierarchical Bayesian methods, preserving much of the computational efficiency of the former while adding posterior uncertainty qu...
Martingale posteriors and related predictive resampling methods replace the likelihood--prior pair used within Bayesian inference with a predictive model for future observations. These methods are simple to implement and increasingly popular due to their computational efficiency, but little is known about their ability...
Hui Wang, Edwin Fong, David T. Frazier· 0 citations
Bayesian inference for discrete models with intractable normalizing constants is computationally challenging, particularly when the sample space is large or countably infinite. Although some likelihood-based Bayesian methods can circumvent the intractable normalizing constant, their uncertainty quantification may be po...
Jiong-Ran Wang, D. Pati, A. Bhattacharya· 0 citations
Experiments with variational autoencoders show that aggregated posterior sampling improves generation for heavy-tailed and clustered data relative to Gaussian prior sampling while performing comparably to models with more flexible latent priors.
Shweta Dutta, Gemma E. Moran· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.