Skip to content

Aggregated Posterior Predictive Checks for Generative Modeling

Sep 2026 · 0 citations
Mathematics Computer Science

TL;DR

Experiments with variational autoencoders show that aggregated posterior sampling improves generation for heavy-tailed and clustered data relative to Gaussian prior sampling while performing comparably to models with more flexible latent priors.

Abstract

Latent variable generative models are commonly fit using simple priors over latent variables, but draws from these priors often fail to produce realistic data. This failure is due to a mismatch between the prior and the aggregated posterior, the distribution of latent variables induced by the fitted model and the data. This mismatch is often viewed as evidence that the prior is misspecified and should be replaced. Alternatively, in modern generative models, a two-stage strategy is increasingly used where first, the model is fit, and second, the aggregated posterior is estimated (van den Oord et al.,2017; Rombach et al., 2022.). Synthetic data are then obtained by sampling from this aggregated posterior instead of the prior. To check such procedures, we introduce the aggregated posterior predictive check (APPC). Theoretically, we establish sufficient conditions under which the APPC is asymptotically calibrated. For probabilistic principal component analysis, we show that the APPC can remain calibrated under a misspecified latent prior when pervasive factors permit recovery of the signal space. Experiments with variational autoencoders show that aggregated posterior sampling improves generation for heavy-tailed and clustered data relative to Gaussian prior sampling while performing comparably to models with more flexible latent priors.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Prior-Amortized In-Context Bayesian Inference for Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models

Hierarchical data is ubiquitous in the empirical sciences and is most commonly analyzed with generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMMs). Bayesian inference for GLMMs yields calibrated uncertainty but requires MCMC; the No-U-Turn Sampler (NUTS) is the gold standard but is slow and must restart from scratch for ever...

Alex Kipnis, Marcel Binz, Eric Schulz · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Bagged Martingale Posteriors: Calibrated Uncertainty Quantification for Predictive Resampling

Martingale posteriors and related predictive resampling methods replace the likelihood--prior pair used within Bayesian inference with a predictive model for future observations. These methods are simple to implement and increasingly popular due to their computational efficiency, but little is known about their ability...

Hui Wang, Edwin Fong, David T. Frazier · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Stochastic Bayes factors: why, when, and how

The Bayes factor (BF) is a central tool in Bayesian hypothesis testing and model selection, yet its practical use is often challenged. Classical BFs depend heavily on prior specification, cannot be applied with improper priors, and are typically interpreted through arbitrary evidence scales. Moreover, they fail to capt...

L. Egidi, I. Ntzoufras · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

High-Dimensional Simulation-Based Inference in Latent Spaces

Neural simulation-based inference (SBI) has been widely successful in inferring a relatively small number of interpretable parameters from potentially high-dimensional observations, such as images or time series. Accordingly, representation learning in SBI has focused almost exclusively on compressing the observations...

Lars Kuhmichel, Stefan T. Radev, B. Koppolu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

On the approximation of posterior laws in compound loss models by conditional Wasserstein GANs

Bayesian inference in compound loss models must often be repeated across policies, market scenarios, and prior specifications. Outside conjugate cases, this may require repeated numerical integration or Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). We formulate this problem as amortized posterior approximation and construct a condi...

Aleksandar Arandjelović, P. Shevchenko, G. Tzougas · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Bayesian Posterior Learning of Mixed Graphical Models

The Mixed Graph WWA method is proposed, a class of MCMC methods for posterior simulation in Bayesian MGMs based on the Birth-Death MCMC methodology that achieves graph recovery accuracy comparable to or better than existing approaches, while maintaining efficient posterior exploration and favorable effective sample siz...

Er-Dong Guo, A. Beskos, M. D. De Iorio · 0 citations

Related blog posts

GPT-Lab Sep 3, 2026

Adaptive AI Agents in Construction Workflows

Adaptive AI agents can help make BIM data more machine-readable by navigating IFC models, interpreting inconsistent information, and mapping it to defined standards. In this blog, Alok Rawat shares findings from a real-world pilot in construction workflows. The post Adaptive AI Agents in Construction Workflows appeared first on GPT-Lab.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.