Skip to content

ST-SafeMAPPO: code, processed NREL ARPA-E PERFORM / OPSD test systems and simulation configurations for minute-level power system production simulation with deep reinforcement learning and safety constraints

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Reference implementation, processed test systems and simulation configurations accompanying the manuscript Minute-Level Power System Production Simulation Algorithm Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning and Safety Constraints (Zheng Li, Juan Su, Yuhao Fu, Yue Xia). The archive contains: (1) the Python source code of ST-SafeMAPPO – the physics-informed spatio-temporal graph attention network (PI-STGAT) with the DC-PTDF electrical coupling distance, the L1 exact-penalty differentiable safety layer (DSL; OSQP forward pass, KKT implicit-differentiation backward pass, warm start, dual-variable feedback), and the CTDE multi-agent PPO training framework with the auxiliary projection loss; (2) the five baselines used in the paper (MLP-MAPPO-DSL, IPPO-DSL, MAPPO-Penalty, MACPO and the rolling Relaxed-MPC-QP benchmark); (3) the processed NREL ARPA-E PERFORM (NYISO, 11 load zones, 5-min actuals, 2018-2019) and Open Power System Data (Germany, 15-min, 2019) profiles together with the test systems built on the IEEE 118-bus and IEEE 30-bus networks (device tables, PTDF, electrical distance, control regions, typical days A/B/C, 30-day long-run window); (4) all YAML configuration files (hyper-parameters of Table 1, system parameters, scenario definitions) and the scripts for downloading and preprocessing the original data, training, and the evaluation protocols of Figs. 4-13 / Table 2; (5) unit tests. Original data: NREL ARPA-E PERFORM datasets (https://data.openei.org/submissions/5772, CC BY 3.0 US) and Open Power System Data, Time series package version 2020-10-06 (https://doi.org/10.25832/time_series/2020-10-06). Code: MIT licence. Processed tables: CC BY 4.0.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.