Skip to content

A Combined Framework for Agile Story Point Estimation Using AHP-Based Expert Weighting, Neutrosophic Z-Numbers, Bonferroni Aggregation, and XGBoost

Sep 2026 · Symmetry · 45 references
Software Engineering Techniques and Practices

Abstract

Accurate story point estimation is crucial for effective agile planning in software development. Both primary methods have inherent limitations. Expert judgment is susceptible to subjectivity, whereas machine learning models require extensive, high-quality, project-specific datasets that are often unavailable. This study proposes a hybrid framework that emphasizes expert reasoning while incorporating data-driven reinforcement. Evaluators are weighted using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and their item-level assessments are expressed as Neutrosophic Z-numbers (NZN) and aggregated using a Bonferroni Mean operator. The resulting estimate is then combined with a prediction from an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model. The framework was tested on 1500 backlog items from an agile team developing a Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) product. “The classification performance, as indicated by an accuracy of 41.18%, a precision of 0.39, and a recall of 0.41, was moderate. In regression analysis, the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was 1.05, the Mean Squared Error (MSE) was 3.15, and the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) was 1.77. Furthermore, the proximity to expert estimates was notable, with 78.88% of predictions falling within ±1 Fibonacci position and 94.65% within ±3 levels.” In terms of classification (accuracy 41.18%, precision 0.39, recall 0.41), regression (Mean Absolute Error (MAE) 1.05, Mean Squared Error (MSE) 3.15, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) 1.77, and proximity to expert estimates (78.88% within ±1 Fibonacci position and 94.65% within ±3 levels), the exact-class accuracy was moderate. Nonetheless, most predictions closely matched expert judgment. Significantly, the NZN–Bonferroni configuration achieved an average sprint completion rate of 97.41%, exceeding the fuzzy AHP benchmark of 93.94%. This framework provides agile teams with a transparent and repeatable method for improving the consistency of sprint planning.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.