It is shown the path to generalizing L2 reasoning to held-out languages goes through broader language coverage, readily available multilingual non-reasoning data, and a sufficient English reasoning backbone, indicating that reasoning is a language-agnostic behavior that can be transferred across typologically diverse languages through careful data mixing.
Abstract
Reasoning language models have made substantial advances on a variety of complex tasks, yet their capabilities remain overwhelmingly English-centric: models primarily reason in English regardless of the language they are prompted in. This is inaccessible for non-English-speaking users, risks losing the intent of the original question, and forgoes knowledge more readily expressed in the target language. In this work, we advance L2 reasoning, the ability of a model to reason consistently in the language of the user's prompt, thus building an in-language bridge between the prompt and the answer. We approach this problem from a data-centric angle, investigating how to optimize data composition and scheduling in SFT for reasoning generalization. Building Tiny Aya L2-Thinker at 3.35B scale, we achieve an L2 reasoning rate above 93% across 60 languages on 6 benchmarks spanning math, commonsense reasoning, instruction following, open-ended generation, and cultural reasoning while keeping performance strong. We show the path to generalizing L2 reasoning to held-out languages goes through broader language coverage, readily available multilingual non-reasoning data, and a sufficient English reasoning backbone. These findings indicate that reasoning is a language-agnostic behavior that can be transferred across typologically diverse languages through careful data mixing and without requiring reasoning supervision in every target language. We release our model weights and multilingual reasoning data to support further research on accessible, in-language reasoning.
Reasoning traces improve large language models (LLMs), but current models are trained to reason mostly in English. It has been shown that forcing a model to reason in another language degrades accuracy, even when the reasoning language matches the language of the prompt -- but only for a setting where the model reasons...
Oliver Hauck, Mario Sanz-Guerrero, Katharina von der Wense· 0 citations
These stages establish a constructive post-training path from English-pivoted capability to multilingual reasoning that is reliably delivered, and jointly track correctness, language adherence, termination, and delivery efficiency.
Hong-Yang Li, Xiao Li, Caesar Wu et al.· 0 citations
This paper reviews several methods aimed at improving reasoning in large language models, including prompt-based approaches, including Chain-of-Thought, self-consistency, and Auto- CoT, which try to guide models to generate intermediate reasoning steps.
MPAR-Bench is introduced, a bilingual English-Chinese benchmark that isolates reasoning breadth through multi-point associative reasoning, and case-level analysis shows that extended reasoning can overturn an initially correct hypothesis.
Si'an Xie, Jiaxu Liu, Biao Yang et al.· 0 citations
HOTFIXR: Hardness Optimized Training data For Improving X-Lingual Reasoning is a data generation framework that uses models to probe and learn a student model's multilingual weaknesses, and generates data to mitigate them that can improve multilingual performance.
Ishika Agarwal, Arkajyoti Charaborty, Tanner Sorensen et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 22, 2026
Flint-interactive gives AI agents a language for creating interactive visualizations. Click a chart, filter data, highlight related content, and explore beyond the view the author originally chose. The post Flint-interactive: A language for creating interactive data visualizations appeared first on Microsoft Research.
A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 15, 2026
Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.