The results suggest that trained SAEs need not reach the corresponding minima, and that the phase diagram of trained models may differ fundamentally from that of objective minimizers.
Abstract
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are increasingly used to recover interpretable features from neural-network activations, yet systematic feature co-occurrence can cause distinct features to be absorbed or merged. The MAIS-O43 open problem proposes a controlled experiment to characterize when recovery of a true synthetic dictionary gives way to feature merging as the nesting fraction $\gamma$, sparsity penalty $\lambda$, and dictionary size $M$ vary. We implement the specified protocol and evaluate 200 independently initialized fits across ten of the 165 grid cells. We observe zero full-dictionary recoveries and zero merges. Instead, every run converges to a reproducible diffuse phase: reconstruction is nearly perfect, but learned atoms typically remain far from the true features (median best cosine 0.5-0.7 against a 0.95 recovery criterion) and learned codes are an order of magnitude denser than the ground truth. This behavior persists under robustness checks and across the full 165-cell grid using standard minibatch Adam (3,300 additional fits). Since the global optimum of the exact sparse-coding objective is known to merge nested features in the two-feature case, these results suggest that trained SAEs need not reach the corresponding minima, and that the phase diagram of trained models may differ fundamentally from that of objective minimizers.
HiPACE is introduced, an evaluation protocol that tests the boundary's structural consequence in real SAE dictionaries--measuring parent--child decoder structure over WordNet families, freezing the discovery-selected statistic before testing on unseen families, and contrasting genuine families against randomized siblin...
Jin-Yuan Zhang, Peng-Ji He, Yin Yuan et al.· 0 citations
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) reveal visual structure in diffusion transformers (DiTs), but interpreting a feature does not establish whether it can be used to control generation. We introduce D-Scope (Diffusion Scope), a framework that connects feature interpretation to generation control through shared visual evidence....
Xinyue Xu, Jiahao Zhang, Li-Jie Hu et al.· 1 citation
The results suggest that wide TopK SAEs should be evaluated not only by reconstruction, sparsity, and feature count, but also by feature reliability under semantic variation and boundary geometry for stable interpretability.
Zhen-Ting Huang, Bo-Han Jiang, J. Liu et al.· 0 citations
PhysSAE, a mechanistic interpretability framework that trains overcomplete sparse autoencoders (SAEs) on PINN penultimate-layer activations and evaluates dictionary atoms through direct causal intervention in the original frozen hidden state, is presented.
Nandita N. Patil, A. EshwarR, G. Honnavar· 0 citations
A systematic study of how pruning affects SAE behavior is presented and theoretically shows that, for a fixed SAE, its impact is governed by perturbation energy, a covariance-weighted norm.
Suchit Gupte, Xue-Ru Zhang, M. Khalili· 0 citations
Mechanistic interpretability of vision transformers seeks to decompose model computation into human-readable units, but learned representations entangle many concepts in each neuron. Feature superposition is widely treated as the central obstacle to this decomposition, yet most mitigations (sparse autoencoders, diction...
Gautam Ranka, S. Pandere, Aiden Dsouza· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 28, 2026
Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 27, 2026
Prabha Jha used her experience with MIT Open Learning’s program for senior executives to develop AI solutions for her employer, Verizon, and to write a book.
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.