BRACE is proposed, an anchored Bellman-residual correction for stale value models that bounds the correction horizon to a prefix of policy tokens and anchors a constant-weight Monte-Carlo tail beyond it, which separates policy correction from reward propagation.
Abstract
Asynchronous reinforcement learning has become the standard way to scale training for large language models (LLM), but the resulting policy lag biases the critic toward the stale behavior policy. Existing work on asynchronous LLM training corrects the actor and leaves this bias unaddressed, while the off-policy value correction of classical RL does not carry over to long-horizon agentic tasks, since a short correction horizon leaves the regression target free of the reward and a long one lets the product of importance ratios drift exponentially with the trajectory length. We propose BRACE, an anchored Bellman-residual correction for stale value models. BRACE bounds the correction horizon to a prefix of policy tokens and anchors a constant-weight Monte-Carlo tail beyond it, which separates policy correction from reward propagation. BRACE delivers a $9.8\%$ relative improvement in mean@1 on BrowseComp-Plus over the strongest baseline, runs $2.46\times$ faster per step than synchronous training, and remains stable $50$ updates off-policy.
Reward-Free Policy Optimization (RFPO), which repurposes a single calibrated, frozen critic as a rollout-level reward, a value baseline for generalized advantage estimation, and a success forecaster for unfinished prefixes is introduced.
Hong-Yang Li, Xiao Li, Caesar Wu et al.· 0 citations
COPC is introduced, an actor--critic method combining token-level ratio masking with two-sided clipped-ratio weighting of TD residuals for return and advantage estimation that achieves the highest reported performance on tool-integrated mathematical reasoning and search, outperforming the strongest reported asynchronou...
Zi-Cheng Hu, Zhi-Jian Zhou, Xuan Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Asynchronous reinforcement learning (RL) for large language model (LLM) agents trains one policy on trajectories generated by another: rollouts come from stale checkpoints, and the inference engine's probabilities differ from the trainer's even at identical parameters. Standard remedies either clip importance ratios, w...
Standard language model RL algorithms credit every token of a long rollout with the same advantage determined by the terminal reward. Actor-critic methods can provide finer-grained credit assignment, but learned critics are generally considered too inaccurate to trust when training LLMs with RL. In recent works, even w...
Kai-Yue Wen, Luke Bailey, Arvind V. Mahankali et al.· 0 citations
It is shown that the instability of RL under TIM is primarily caused by drift: a persistent bias between training and inference engines that accumulates with every training step, and an additive score centering term is derived that stabilizes RL under TIM by canceling drift.
Critic-free reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) for agentic large language models is often done through GRPO-style methods, which compute a group baseline over repeated rollouts to reduce target variance. However, this setup is ill-suited to agents acting in stateful environments such as live services or security sandboxes...
Joery A. de Vries, Neil D. Lawrence, Zhen-Wen Dai· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.