Skip to content
#reinforcement learning Dataset Open access

Navigating the smart tourism era: a systematic review of how intelligent systems are shaping the future of travel

Sep 2026 · Figshare

Abstract

Tourism recommendation systems use artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and data analytics to support travel decisions. This systematic literature review examines decision types, disciplinary distribution, themes, and research gaps in AI-based tourism recommendation research. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we reviewed 75 Scopus indexed articles published between 2009 and 2025. The studies were classified into four decision types: Macro-Level destination guidance, Micro-Level place recommendations, Planning-Level itinerary and route planning, and Support & Service-Level recommendations. The findings show that research is concentrated in Micro-Level and Planning-Level recommendations, while Macro-Level and Support & Service-Level recommendations receive less attention. Most studies were published in computer science journals, with limited representation in tourism, business, and social science outlets. Keyword cooccurrence analysis identified six themes: applied analytics and social media, neural recommender systems and smart tourism, POI and route planning, classical ML techniques, tourism industry recommendation methods, and reinforcement learning-based trip planning. The findings identify future research opportunities to connect the four decision types across the travel journey, align data and system design with tourism-specific decisions and conditions, strengthen the use of tourism and business perspectives, and examine how emerging technologies can support traveler needs, tourism organizations, service coordination, and practical smart tourism applications. It contributes a decision oriented framework and future research agenda for tourism recommendation systems.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.