Skip to content

Artificial Intelligence for Early Prediction and Diagnosis of Neonatal Sepsis: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions

Sep 2026 · Applied Sciences · 0 citations · 56 references
Neonatal and Maternal Infections

Abstract

Neonatal sepsis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, while timely diagnosis continues to be challenging because of nonspecific clinical manifestations and limitations of conventional diagnostic methods. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have created new opportunities for the early prediction and diagnosis of neonatal sepsis through the analysis of large and complex clinical datasets. This structured narrative review summarizes current evidence regarding AI-based approaches for neonatal sepsis prediction and diagnosis. A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar identified studies evaluating machine learning, deep learning, and advanced predictive analytics using clinical, laboratory, physiological, electronic health record, and multi-omics data. Current evidence suggests that AI models, particularly ensemble learning, gradient boosting, and deep learning approaches, can achieve promising predictive performance and identify infants at increased risk of sepsis hours before conventional clinical recognition. Continuous physiological monitoring and multimodal data integration appear particularly promising for real-time prediction. However, important challenges remain, including limited external validation, small and heterogeneous datasets, concerns regarding interpretability, and unresolved ethical and regulatory issues. Future progress will depend on multicenter collaboration, explainable AI frameworks, federated learning, and multimodal predictive models. Although current evidence supports the predictive potential of AI-based models, prospective multicenter validation and clinical impact studies are required before improvements in neonatal clinical outcomes can be established. Artificial intelligence has the potential to become a valuable clinical decision support tool to support early sepsis recognition and precision neonatal care.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.