Skip to content

Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Organizational Trust: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda

Sep 2026 · Journal International Review of Research Studies · 1 citation · 18 references
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are becoming deeply ingrained in organizational decision-making processes due to their ability to improve efficiencies, scalability and analytics-related accuracy. Consequently, organizations have faced more severe ethical issues around transparency and bias, as well as sustainability challenges around trustworthiness. While there has been some research conducted on AI capabilities, ethics and human trust in AI systems, research has remained siloed across academic fields. This paper aims to conduct a review of recent literature exploring AI capabilities and ethics and their relationship with organizational trust. The study will be completed by conducting a literature review on peer-reviewed articles published from 2020 to 2025 using a PRISMA-guided methodology. Articles will be reviewed based on keywords related to artificial intelligence-enabled decision-making, ethical issues in organizations, explainability and trust in organizational settings. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, four central themes were found: 1) AI as a source of competitive advantage for organizational decision-making; 2) AI ethics, including bias, opacity, and lack of accountability; 3) Trust as a multicomponent process developed through performance, transparency, and accountability; and 4) Responsible AI governance as a moderating factor between efficiency and legitimacy. There is existing research to suggest that trust in technology is formed not only by performance but by transparency and explainability factors as well as ethical acceptability. This paper offers several contributions. First, it combines both strategic and behavioral schools of thought into one framework for understanding how trust can be formed in AI-mediated decision-making processes. Second, it identifies gaps in current literature and suggests a future research agenda including multilevel trust, industry differences in AI and ethical considerations, and measurement of responsible AI. Overall, AI-enabled decision-making is not sustainable if the organization cannot effectively implement AI with ethical risk mitigation practices.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of such models.

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8

PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection

Empirically, PRISM reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines, and achieves this efficiency while simultaneously enhancing performance, surpassing models fine-tuned on the full dataset across eight multimodal and three language understanding benchmarks.

Jinhe Bi, Yifan Wang, Danqi Yan et al. · 73 citations · ⚡4
#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Apr 2020

ECCOLA - a Method for Implementing Ethically Aligned AI Systems

The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.

Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson · 64 citations · ⚡6
#computer vision Review Apr 2024

AI-powered Code Review with LLMs: Early Results

The goal is to not only refine the accuracy of the LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.

Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al. · 62 citations · ⚡3

Let the Flows Tell: Solving Graph Combinatorial Optimization Problems with GFlowNets

This paper designs Markov decision processes (MDPs) for different combinatorial problems and proposes to train conditional GFlowNets to sample from the solution space and demonstrates that GFlowNet policies can efficiently find high-quality solutions.

Dinghuai Zhang, H. Dai, Esmeralda S. Whitammer et al. · 59 citations · ⚡8

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.