Skip to content

Can Large Language Models Execute Parent Orders?

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.28410 · 1 citation · 41 references
Computer Science Economics

TL;DR

PACE (Plan-Ahead Controlled Execution), a hierarchical framework that decomposes parent-order execution into long-horizon planning and short-horizon execution, requiring neither explicit market assumptions nor task-specific training is proposed, suggesting that LLMs can complement human traders in execution decisions.

Abstract

Parent-order execution is a core problem in algorithmic trading, where the goal is to split a large order into smaller orders while reducing execution costs. Existing approaches either rely on pre-specified market assumptions that may not hold in practice, or require task-specific training that limits adaptability to new settings. To overcome these limitations, we present the first systematic study of large language models (LLMs) for parent-order execution. This extends the use of LLMs in finance from what to trade to how to execute. We propose PACE (Plan-Ahead Controlled Execution), a hierarchical framework that decomposes parent-order execution into long-horizon planning and short-horizon execution, requiring neither explicit market assumptions nor task-specific training. Experiments on Shenzhen Stock Exchange Level-1 data show that PACE outperforms TWAP, Almgren-Chriss, and learning-based baselines, exceeding the strongest baseline by 0.65 bps. Behavioral analysis reveals that LLMs make execution decisions differently from human investors: higher model confidence predicts better performance rather than worse returns, and the model trades earlier rather than procrastinating toward the deadline. These findings suggest that LLMs can complement human traders in execution decisions.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Aug 2026

What is Missing from AI Post-Training AI: An Empirical Analysis

Analyzing a large corpus of publicly released post-training trajectories, it is found that across different tasks, the agent's training strategy is locked in at the very beginning, and the entire remaining budget is spent on local adjustments within the selected strategy.

J. Lim, Xin Huang, Hao Peng et al. · 2 citations · ⚡1
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Can Language Models Learn to Forecast Stock Prices

Results show that post-training can substantially improve financial forecasting performance, together with changes in how the model investigates the market, on this outcome-selected benchmark.

Jia-Cheng Guo, Suo-Zhi Huang, Shu-Zhen Li et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

What Limits Recursive Reasoning Models: Optimization, Architecture and Test-Time Scaling

Recursive reasoning models apply a small shared Transformer block many times to refine a latent state. This gives them large effective depth with few parameters and makes them strong on algorithmic tasks. Such compact solvers are natural candidates for tools that an LLM can call on narrow algorithmic subproblems. Howev...

Yuliana Shakhvalieva, Dmitrii Kharchev, В. Е. Безруков et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Learning What to Investigate Next: Meta-Reasoning for Long-Horizon Research Agents

Long-horizon research agents must decide both how to investigate and what to investigate next as evidence accumulates. This is hard to learn because such decisions are sparse in long execution traces, and their consequences may emerge several investigations later. We introduce Meta-reasoning for Iterative Research Agen...

Ankur Samanta, Yonathan Efroni, Paul Sajda et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.