Skip to content
Open access

Two-Dimensional Cephalometric Assessment of Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Changes Following Alt-RAMEC with a 2-Hinged Maxillary Expander and RME/Facemask Therapy in Skeletal Class III Patients with Maxillary Retrusion: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Aug 2026 · Diagnostics · Vol 16, pp. 2630 · 0 citations · 43 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Sagittal A-point displacement was observed following Alt-RAMEC/2-HME in late-growth skeletal Class III patients with maxillary retrusion, however, in the absence of an untreated age- and skeletal maturity-matched control group, the observed displacement cannot be distinguished definitively from the normal craniofacial growth trajectory.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This retrospective cephalometric study evaluated skeletal, alveolar, and dentoalveolar changes following alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction using a two-hinged maxillary expander (Alt-RAMEC/2-HME) and rapid maxillary expansion with facemask therapy (RME/FM) in skeletal Class III patients with maxillary retrusion, using a Le Fort I osteotomy group as a surgical reference. Methods: Pre-treatment (T0) and post-treatment (T1) lateral cephalometric radiographs of 42 patients were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups—Alt-RAMEC/2-HME (n = 14), RME/FM (n = 14), and Le Fort I osteotomy (n = 14)—representing late-growth adolescents, growing children, and mature adults, respectively. Sagittal and vertical landmark positions were measured using a Cartesian coordinate system. The primary outcome was sagittal A-point displacement between T0 and T1. Intergroup changes were compared using non-parametric tests (p < 0.05). Results: Sagittal A-point displacement increased significantly in all groups. A larger A-point displacement was observed in the Le Fort I osteotomy group than in the two orthopedic groups (p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed between the Alt-RAMEC/2-HME and RME/FM groups. Greater dentoalveolar positional changes were observed in the RME/FM group, in the maxillary incisor and molar regions. Conclusions: Sagittal A-point displacement was observed following Alt-RAMEC/2-HME in late-growth skeletal Class III patients with maxillary retrusion. However, in the absence of an untreated age- and skeletal maturity-matched control group, the observed displacement cannot be distinguished definitively from the normal craniofacial growth trajectory. These findings should also be interpreted in light of the retrospective study design and baseline differences between groups.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary alveolar bone and point A remodeling after premolar-extraction decompensation in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

INTRODUCTION This study evaluated the remodeling patterns of point A (subspinale) and the maxillary alveolar bone after premolar-extraction decompensation in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. METHODS Cone-beam computed tomography data from 40 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion were collected b...

Yan Jiang, Xiao-Jing Zhang, Can-Yang Jiang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Design Modifications of the Twin-Block Appliance: Facial and Dentoalveolar Outcomes in Class II Individuals

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the sagittal and vertical cephalometric changes observed in growing patients with Class II malocclusion and permanent dentition treated with a Modified Twin Block (TBM) with those observed in a historical control group of untreated individuals. Materials and Methods:...

Omar Maximino Milia, Mercedes Martín Moreno, S. de la Cruz-Vigo et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after customized elastodontic appliance therapy in mixed dentition children with maxillary transverse deficiency: a retrospective CBCT study

It is suggested that CEA may expand maxillary and mandibular arches in mixed dentition children with maxillary transverse deficiency with preliminary CBCT-based evidence for the transverse expansion effects of CEA in mixed dentition children.

Jian-Hua Li, Xinran Fan, Qingyu Wang · 0 citations
Case report Open access Sep 2026

Nonsurgical Orthodontic Camouflage of Adult Skeletal Class III Malocclusion With Anterior and Posterior Crossbites and Pre-existing Alveolar Bone Loss: A Case Report

Adult skeletal Class III malocclusion in non-growing patients may be managed with combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgery or, in carefully selected mild discrepancies, orthodontic dentoalveolar camouflage. We report a 33-year-old Mongolian woman evaluated at the first documented presentation (Day 0) with maxillary an...

Bolormaa Sainbayar, Khongorzul Myagmarjav, Nursabi Khizatkhan et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Pre- and post-treatment cephalometric changes in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion treated with orthodontic camouflage: a retrospective study

Background. Class III malocclusion is a complex condition involving sagittal skeletal and dental discrepancies and is often associated with a concave facial profile. In selected adult patients, orthodontic camouflage represents a non-surgical treatment option aimed primarily at improving occlusion and facial relationsh...

S. Pop, Bianca Arsintescu, Adél Ambrus et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Effects of non-extraction class II treatment with maxillary distalization and intermaxillary elastics using passive self-ligating brackets: a cephalometric study

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the craniofacial effects of non-extraction class II camouflage treatment using maxillary distalization and intermaxillary class II elastics in late adolescent patients.Methods: This retrospective study included 26 patients (20 females, 6 males; mean age: 15.2±1.3 years) with skeletal...

M. B. Kadıoğlu, Meyra Durmaz, M. Rübendiz · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.