Skip to content

Solving the Elastic Wave Equation with Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Robust and Critical Assessment

Sep 2026 · 1 citation
Computer Science

TL;DR

A robust and critical assessment of PINNs for solving the elastic wave equation in seismology is provided and it is demonstrated that this novel architecture enhances accuracy when applied to the acoustic wave equation, underlying the versatility of the network.

Abstract

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a promising approach for solving Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), offering a meshfree alternative that integrates physical principles into the learning process. This presents a new paradigm compared to traditional discretization methods and purely data-driven machine learning techniques. While promising, PINNs are not a panacea; they inherit challenges such as spectral bias and unstable convergence. Moreover, their potential in seismology remains largely unexplored. In this work, we provide a robust and critical assessment of PINNs for solving the elastic wave equation in seismology. We investigate the performance of PINNs on problems with varying degrees of complexity across various seismic sources and parameter models, from constant to highly heterogeneous settings. A pivotal aspect of our work involves investigating whether embedding physical principles directly into the network architecture enhances convergence and accuracy. We test an extensive range of neural architecture designs, from unrestricted, uninformed PINNs to highly specialized ones. We find that integrating an understanding of wave physics into the network design significantly improves accuracy. For instance, introducing a custom wavelet or plane wave layer, coupled with encoder and decoder layers, consistently yields a relative $L_2$ error approximately half that of the standard PINN, as evidenced across numerous experiments. We further demonstrate that this novel architecture enhances accuracy when applied to the acoustic wave equation, underlying the versatility of our network. Another key contribution of our research is the successful conditioning of PINNs on seismic source locations. This signifies a considerable advancement towards rapid seismic hazard detection and seismic analysis.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Physics-informed sampled neural networks (PISaNN) for modelling nonlinear waves

This study provides the first application of a PINN-based framework to cubic nonlinear shear-wave propagation in soft solids and out performs the baseline PINNs while requiring no simulation or experimental data for training.

V. Pratap, B. Tripathi · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for inverse analysis: An illustration

This paper investigates the application of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to solve inverse problems in solid mechanics. Traditional numerical methods, such as finite element method (FEM) and isogeometric analysis (IGA), often require significant computational time, hindering their applicability in scenarios r...

Nhi Phuong Thi Nguyen, M. N. Nguyen, T. Q. Bui et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Biot's Model via Fixed-Stress Splitting and Energy Natural Gradient Descent

A robust PINN-based solver is proposed, termed FS-ENGD-PINN, which synergistically integrates physics-based decoupling with geometry-aware optimization, and which consistently outperforms standard PINN formulations in terms of accuracy and robustness.

Kexin Sun, Qiang Liu, Ming-Cheng Feng et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

An adaptive collocation physics-informed neural networks for multidimensional heat conduction problems in complex geometries

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as an effective framework for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding physical laws directly into the learning process. However, variable thermal conductivity and discontinuous solutions introduce heterogeneous coefficients, sharp gradients and no...

Meseret Cherkos Tessema, Tamirat Temesgen Dufera, Mitiku Daba Deresse et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

A Systematic Analysis of Automatic Differentiation versus Discretization-based Constraints for Physics-Informed PDE Solvers

As nonlinearity strengthens, the accuracy advantage of discretization-based constraints becomes increasingly pronounced, with smaller optimization errors compensating for the truncation errors, and the more complex the nonlinearity and boundary conditions, the greater the advantage of GNN over MLP.

Xing Guo, Hong-Wei Tang, Ze-Wei Meng et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Framework Integrating the Dynamic Stiffness Matrix with Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Eigenvalue Problems and Analysing Dynamic Response

A framework that integrates the dynamic stiffness matrix (DSM) with physics-informed neural networks (PINN) that embeds physical constraints within the model and demonstrates robustness, particularly when addressing limited datasets across diverse investigations is introduced.

Yi-Jun An, Zhijiang Chen, Zhi-Qiang Feng et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.