We study the local errors of classical machine-learning surrogate models, which approximate the time evolution of the one-dimensional viscous Burgers equation. Four models are compared on the same prediction task, using the spatial grid values directly: radial basis function (RBF) kernel ridge regression (KRR), linear Ridge, ExtraTrees, and Random Forests. Across all four models, the one-step residual, defined here as the true value minus the predicted value at each grid point, forms clear curved branches near predicted maxima and minima. A more detailed analysis of KRR shows that these errors are much more strongly related to the second spatial derivative, which measures local curvature, than to the first spatial derivative. Near a smooth extremum, predicted value and curvature form a local two-branch fold. Under our local curvature-based model of the residual, this fold predicts a leading-order near-parabolic relation between predicted value and residual. This geometric result motivates a direct test of the Burgers advection (transport) and diffusion (smoothing) terms. For KRR and Ridge, regression tests on held-out trajectories, a control that breaks the spatial alignment of the diffusion term, and a spectral test of high-frequency content are consistent with insufficient viscous smoothing at moderate and high viscosity. In this case, the surrogate retains more small-scale structure than the true future state. The same physical explanation is much weaker for the tree models. Finally, a correction that uses only predicted quantities reduces both one-step error and error during recursive rollout, where each prediction is used as the next input.
We employ pseudospectral methods to solve the homogeneous Ornstein-Zernike (OZ) equation for a model fluid in the vicinity of the critical point. Focusing on the Mean-Spherical Approximation (MSA) as a closure to the OZ equation, we obtain numerical estimates for the critical exponents $\eta$, $\delta$ and $\gamma$ for...
J. Skelton, J. Brader, S. Tschopp et al.· 0 citations
In this paper, we extend numerical schemes based on parameterized Young measures and linear programming to two space dimensions and apply them to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability governed by the two-dimensional Euler equations of gas dynamics. We construct first-, second-, third-, fifth-, seventh-, and ninth-order Youn...
Neural surrogates for vector-valued partial differential equations can fit training data yet change their predictions when the same physical state is expressed in a rotated coordinate frame. We study this failure on three-dimensional Navier--Stokes dynamics observed at irregularly placed points. We introduce the Invari...
This paper introduces the mollified-sharp decomposition, a probabilistic regularization of moving shocks in parametric reduced-order models. Each detected shock location is treated as a random variable with a prescribed probability density. Averaging over this artificial distribution replaces the localized pressure cha...
We consider the ill-posed inverse problem of recovering the drift potential of an overdamped Langevin diffusion from discrete, possibly irregular position observations. Specializing the suboptimality gap for inverse stochastic control to drift-potential recovery, we parametrize the associated value function in a finite...
We study the gap between the integrated direction-wise kinetic minima and the minimum expected Dirichlet energy of a joint particle realization of a prescribed two-parameter family of conditional probability measures. Under regular coarea assumptions with compact connected fibres and a star-shaped parameter domain, we...
Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 27, 2026
Prabha Jha used her experience with MIT Open Learning’s program for senior executives to develop AI solutions for her employer, Verizon, and to write a book.
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.