The results demonstrate that a clean teacher alone is not a sufficient safeguard: poisoned distillation data can produce a strongly backdoored student while maintaining competitive performance on clean images.
Abstract
Knowledge distillation is widely used to transfer behavior from a large teacher model to a smaller student. It is often assumed to be safe when the teacher is clean, because classic backdoor attacks rely on poisoned labels and triggers in supervised training, whereas distillation trains the student to match a teacher's outputs. We show that this assumption can fail when the distillation dataset itself is poisoned. Our attack injects triggered and manipulated images that a clean teacher already predicts as an attacker chosen target label, which causes the student to learn a backdoor even though the teacher remains unaffected. We evaluate this threat across multiple manipulation strategies, including targeted adversarial perturbations and targeted GAN based class transitions, and study how distillation settings influence both accuracy and attack success. We show that the attack remains effective even at a 10% poisoning rates. The results demonstrate that a clean teacher alone is not a sufficient safeguard: poisoned distillation data can produce a strongly backdoored student while maintaining competitive performance on clean images. These findings show that the integrity and provenance of distillation data are part of the security boundary of data intensive KD pipelines, even when the teacher itself is trusted.
On-policy distillation (OPD) has attracted growing attention as an effective way to transfer capabilities from teacher models to student models. Recent studies further explore OPD as a tool for improving large language model safety with promising results. However, these approaches typically assume that the teacher and...
Jian Luo, Ke-Han Qi, Qing-Qiao Hu et al.· 0 citations
Adversarial distillation transfers the robustness of a strong teacher to a lightweight student, and most methods implicitly assume the teacher is reliable at every adversarial point. We test this assumption empirically. We define teacher supervision failure as the event that the teacher’s top-1 prediction on an adversa...
Jia-Yu Miao· International Conference on...· 0 citations
A controlled evaluation of adversarial transferability across 60 detectors spanning six backbones, two pretraining regimes, and five training-data configurations establishes source-model selection as central dimensions of credible transfer-based black-box robustness evaluation.
Rafael M. Mamede, Pedro C. Neto, A. F. Sequeira· 0 citations
Adversarial robustness distillation typically treats a robust teacher as a fixed knowledge source and transfers robustness to a compact student in a one-way manner. This paradigm terminates teacher-student interaction once the student is distilled, thereby discarding potentially useful feedback from the distilled stude...
Zhi Li, Hao Liu, Hong-Chen Yang et al.· 0 citations
Knowledge distillation is widely used to transfer capabilities from teacher models to student models, but recent work shows that it can also transfer unintended teacher properties. We study whether different hidden teacher properties survive the same distillation channels. Specifically, we compare two properties: bench...
J. Mansurov, Sholpan Bolatzhanova, Filbert Aurelian Tjiaranta et al.· 0 citations
It is argued that a more realistic threat model includes further training with reinforcement learning after distillation, and it is shown that simple attacks can steal reasoning capabilities from existing closed-source language models using data easily obtainable from current APIs, yielding reasoning improvements equiv...
S. Javaheri, Alexander Panfilov, O. Britton et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.