Skip to content

UniRRM: Unified Reasoning Reward Models Across Languages and Evaluation Paradigms

Sep 2026 · 1 citation · 53 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A unified reasoning reward model supporting multiple languages and evaluation paradigms, UniRRM uses a staged reasoning chain to dynamically generate task-generic and instruction-specific criteria, enabling fine-grained, input-adaptive judgments while maintaining consistency across languages.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) excels on tasks with verifiable rewards, but in open-ended tasks, the reliability of reward models remains a key challenge. Existing solutions either depend on costly proprietary LLM-as-a-Judge systems or opaque scalar reward models that lack interpretability. Recent works on generative reward models offer a promising alternative, but they remain constrained by static evaluation criteria, fragmented evaluation paradigms, and limited multilingual support. To address these challenges, we introduce \textbf{MixReward}, a large-scale multilingual dataset spanning six domains and 103 languages, containing both pairwise and listwise data, and propose \textbf{UniRRM}, a unified reasoning reward model supporting multiple languages and evaluation paradigms. UniRRM uses a staged reasoning chain to dynamically generate task-generic and instruction-specific criteria, enabling fine-grained, input-adaptive judgments while maintaining consistency across languages. Experiments demonstrate that UniRRM-8B and UniRRM-14B achieve performance close to the state-of-the-art for models of comparable size across multiple benchmarks, and are effective for unseen evaluation paradigms. In addition, ablation studies validate the reliability and effectiveness of UniRRM.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

What Does Post-Training Change in Multilingual Reasoning?

These stages establish a constructive post-training path from English-pivoted capability to multilingual reasoning that is reliably delivered, and jointly track correctness, language adherence, termination, and delivery efficiency.

Hong-Yang Li, Xiao Li, Caesar Wu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Aug 2026

A Survey on Rubric-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Language Models

A Bayesian framework that defines constitutions as prior distributions over evaluation criteria and rubrics as conditional instantiations is introduced, and a taxonomy of rubric-guided RL along the prior-posterior axis is presented, covering constitutional AI, instance-specific rubrics, process-level supervision, self-...

Zifei Shan, F. Shao · 4 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Gradients Know What Outcomes Don't: Unlocking Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning with Gradient-Aligned Rewards

Gradient-Aligned Reward (GAR), which operates in the policy's own gradient space: truncated backpropagation through the output projection layer extracts a compact gradient vector for each rollout, and cosine similarity with an expert-anchor gradient yields a dense, reasoning-aware reward with less than 9% wall-clock ov...

Le-Qi Zheng, Jin-Bo Su, Fang Niu et al. · 2 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Cliff: Learning Process Rewards from the First Mistake

Cliff, a reward shaping strategy that utilizes an off-the-shelf LLM as a teacher to identify the first mistake in each rollout, is proposed and established as a simple, general and effective approach for improving RLVR with richer, fine-grained supervision.

Pei-Xuan Han, Runnan Wang, Ketan Ramaneti et al. · 1 citation
#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

Small Language Models as Judges for Rubric-Based Reinforcement Learning

This work studies whether smaller language models can serve as efficient and reliable rubric-based judges, and compares three ways of extracting criterion-level judgments from small models: Generative verdicts, Yes/No Logprob margins, and Probe judges.

Feng-Yu Xie, Yilun Zhao, Bingsen Chen et al. · 2 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

A Systematic Study of Small Language Models on Abstract Reasoning Tasks

Endpoint accuracy on abstract-reasoning benchmarks does not reveal whether a language model has acquired a transferable rule or fit distribution-specific regularities. We study this distinction in small language models on the ARC-TGI benchmark, which organizes abstract grid transformations into controllable task famili...

Nur A. Zarin Nishat, Jens Lehmann, Andrei C. Aioanei et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.