Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

Artificial Intelligence AI-Driven Digital Forensics in Cybercrime Investigations: Addressing Data Privacy and Ethical Considerations

Aug 2026 · NOUN Interdisciplinary Journal of Computing, E-Learning & Application (NOUN-IJCEA) · 0 citations · 21 references

TL;DR

Comparative benchmarking proves that ADEFIF surpasses all current frameworks such as Traditional Digital Forensics, Multidimensional AI Forensic Analysis Framework (MAFAF), and Privacy-by-Design AI Forensic Model (PbDAIF), in all the assessment dimensions.

Abstract

Cybercrime is growing at a rapid pace and it has proved that traditional digital forensic investigation approaches lack a number of critical gaps that demand the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to improve the efficiency, accuracy and scalability of digital investigations. The introduction of AI in forensic domains comes with concurrent challenges to issues like data privacy and confidentiality, algorithmic bias, AI ethical accountability, and legal admissibility for evidence and testimony. In this paper, the authors present the AI-Driven Ethical Forensic Investigation Framework (ADEFIF). The modular architecture is novel; includes a combination of machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), natural language processing (NLP), explainable AI (XAI), federated learning, differential privacy, and blockchain-based audit logging as part of a digital forensic investigation system. The ADEFIF is based on four theoretic pillars: Socio-Technical Systems Theory (STST), Deontological Ethics, Data Protection and Privacy Theory, and the Explainable AI Framework (ExAI). The framework demonstrates excellent AI accuracy across all of the public, synthetic, and simulated forensic datasets, with a value of 94.5%, excellent ethical compliance score of 92.0%, and a privacy protection score value of 93.0%, resulting in an overall system performance of 93.2% across 95,000 records across the three datasets. Comparative benchmarking proves that ADEFIF surpasses all current frameworks such as Traditional Digital Forensics, Multidimensional AI Forensic Analysis Framework (MAFAF), and Privacy-by-Design AI Forensic Model (PbDAIF), in all the assessment dimensions. By incorporating investigative strategies alongside ethical considerations, privacy protections, and protocols, this framework fills a crucial space in this research niche, both by addressing the need for responsible and legally robust systems of cybercrime investigations and by serving as a blueprint for continuous refinement and innovation within AI-powered investigative frameworks.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.