Skip to content
#federated learning Review Open access

Blockchain for Security and Privacy in AI-Based Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Aug 2026 · Jurnal Media Elektrik · 0 citations

TL;DR

It is recommended that educational institutions and Ed-Tech developers transition to a hybrid storage architecture and the results of the empirical analysis show that centralized databases are highly vulnerable to Single Points of Failure (SPOF).

Abstract

The transformation of education driven by artificial intelligence (AI) requires massive data flows, which poses serious challenges to student privacy if stored on a centralized infrastructure. This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of blockchain technology in mitigating AI data security risks (RQ1) and analyze the role of data sovereignty mechanisms in protecting student privacy (RQ2). Following the PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was conducted in the DOAJ and IEEE Xplore databases (2021–2026). From the initial 873 articles, 20 high-quality articles were selected through a quality assessment procedure and analyzed using Narrative Synthesis Analysis. The results of the empirical analysis show that centralized databases are highly vulnerable to Single Points of Failure (SPOF). As a solution, blockchain integration mitigates this risk through the implementation of Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI) and Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP), which enable AI models (Federated Learning) to verify data without compromising Layer-2 scalability (zk-rollups), which have been shown to reduce transaction costs by up to 90%, as well as agent-centric protocols (holochain) for ecological efficiency. This study recommends that educational institutions and Ed-Tech developers transition to a hybrid storage architecture. The limitations of this study include the niche nature of the literature sample and the scope limitations of the database. Future research should focus on testing the latencies of real-time prototypes in academic environments.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.