Back to #software testing
#software testing Review Open access

Phenotypic variability of Fragile-X syndrome in Asian population: A systematic review.

Aug 2026 · Intractable & Rare Diseases Research · Vol 15 3, pp. 232-246 · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

The findings show that the physical characteristics of FXS are variable in the Asian group but similar to those in other populations and are not recommended for early recognition.

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common genetic cause of inherited intellectual disabilities. Individuals with full mutation of FXS exhibit physical and behavioral symptoms in addition to other comorbidities. The clinical features of FXS have been widely studied in Caucasians; however, they remain limited in the Asian population. This study aimed to characterize the spectrum and variability of physical and behavioral phenotypes in Asian populations. A total of 5,830 studies from the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Cochrane/CENTRAL databases were screened using the Covidence software. We identified FXS-specific research studies conducted in Asia that reported the clinical characteristics of individuals with FXS. This review summarizes 51 studies from different Asian regions. The frequently reported physical characteristics were large and prominent ears (72.63%), an elongated face (57.49%), and macroorchidism (45.21%). The three most prevalent behavioral characteristics were intellectual disability (ID), hyperactivity, and social withdrawal, reported in 99%, 77%, and 55% of all cases, respectively. Our findings show that the physical characteristics of FXS are variable in the Asian group but similar to those in other populations and are not recommended for early recognition. Individuals with intellectual disabilities, especially when combined with autism spectrum disorders and large prominent ears, are suggestive of further genetic testing for FXS.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#software testing Preprint Aug 2026

Evaluating Inference-Time Defenses Against Package Hallucination in LLM-Generated Code

LLMs are increasingly used for code generation, yet they frequently hallucinate non-existent software packages, creating exploitable entry points into the software supply chain. We make four contributions to this problem. First, we show that prior evaluation methodologies systematically inflate hallucination rates by misclassifying standard-library modules as hallucinations in some languages. For Python, the overestimation reaches 9.4 percentage points. Second, we evaluate seven inference-time defenses for mitigating package hallucinations, including five guided decoding strategies (Greedy, Contrastive, DoLa, Nudging, and Active Layer-Contrastive Decoding), an iterative self-refinement approach (Self-Refine), and a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based defense.. Across eight models spanning five families and four programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Ruby, Rust), RAG reduces the package hallucination rate (PHR) in 18 of 32 model--language configurations. Third, we introduce Package Utility (PU) to assess whether defenses preserve valid and task-relevant recommendations. Among strategies evaluated, Greedy decoding provides the strongest average mitigation--utility trade-off. Fourth, we stress-test all strategies under adversarial prompts seeded with fabricated package names and find that PHR surges by up to 45 percentage points relative to standard prompts, with Ruby consistently the most vulnerable language (80.9--95.2\%). Under adversarial conditions, RAG and Self-Refine outperform all decoding-only strategies, indicating that robust defense requires either external grounding or iterative self-verification when prompts are actively hostile. Our results recast package hallucination as both a measurement problem and a decoding-time control problem, and they demonstrate that the choice of defense must be matched to the threat model and recommendation utility.

Albérick Euraste Djiré, Iyiola E. Olatunji, Melissa Tessa et al. · 1 citation
#software testing Review Aug 2026

Model-Based Agentic Software Engineering

MAGE explains how externalized knowledge, bounded action, independent evaluation, and retained human authority can compose into a governed engineering environment, and proposes tests of when that environment turns commodity intelligence into durable engineering progress.

James C. Davis, Kelechi G. Kalu, Hui-Yun Peng et al. · 1 citation
#software testing Preprint Aug 2026

Why and When Neural Networks Improve Local Approximation in Optimization

It is shown that the contradiction in experience with neural surrogates in derivative-free optimisation dissolves once three factors are stated, and that these, rather than the fit accuracy a training curve reports, are what delimit when a learned local model pays.

Cheng Bian, Pengcheng Xie · 0 citations

Mixed Reality Glasses Image Translocation for Binocular Diplopia.

This prototype MRG image translocation software was helpful to 69% of patients with binocular diplopia, but limited by large angle strabismus because of the limited instrument field of view.

Edsel B Ing, Kevin Sha, Sarosh Dandoti et al. · 0 citations
#software testing Open access Aug 2026

Multi-Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Web-Based Diagnostic Support System for Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Parkinson\'s Disease

A diagnostic support system based on a unified web platform that classifies patients according to the risks of developing three diseases based on regularly collected clinical or audio data using classical supervised learning algorithms is presented.

Vedamurthy D R, Dr. Anup Ritti, A. Bibi et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 17, 2026

Q&A: Rethinking how innovation happens

In his latest book, Professor Eugene Fitzgerald examines the forces that turn breakthroughs into value — and why innovation resists simple formulas.