In medical imaging, the clinical value of Computed Tomography (CT) lies not only in depicting current disease status, but crucially in enabling longitudinal comparison of serial scans to determine disease evolution, a process that underpins response assessment, recurrence detection, and ongoing patient management. Yet, despite this central role of temporal comparison in clinical decision-making, existing medical foundation models remain largely confined to single-study understanding, leaving temporally grounded cross-examination insufficiently addressed. To address this gap, we study longitudinal imaging difference reporting, a task in which a model takes two temporally separated scans from the same patient and generates a clinically meaningful report describing interval changes between them. We introduce CT-$\Delta$Bench, a dedicated benchmark for this task with patient-level splitting to prevent information leakage. To better evaluate this task beyond surface-level text similarity, we further develop change-aware metrics specifically designed to capture clinically meaningful longitudinal changes, and conduct an independent physician validation to assess the reliability of the synthesized references and event extraction pipeline. We also compare direct paired-CT reasoning with an indirect two-stage pipeline that first generates single-timepoint reports and then performs textual differencing. Finally, we propose DeltaMed, a baseline model for direct paired-CT difference reporting, and train it on the benchmark training set. Together, these contributions lay the groundwork for temporally aware medical foundation models that better reflect real-world longitudinal clinical reasoning.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) interpretation is fundamental to clinical decision-making, requiring radiologists to integrate multi-view anatomical planes across sequential timepoints while precisely localizing interval changes. However, existing vision-language benchmarks remain confined to single-timepoint, single-...
Wafa Al Ghallabi, Ritesh Thawkar, Sara Ghaboura et al.· 0 citations
Computed tomography (CT) is widely used for clinical diagnosis and longitudinal follow-up, yet automatically generating accurate and complete radiology reports from three-dimensional (3D) CT remains challenging. Existing methods improve fine-grained correspondence between images and text by modeling anatomical regions,...
The effect of real-world distribution shifts on three-dimensional AI models for lung nodule analysis on CT and MedStyle-3DG, an open-source 3D vision-language framework for domain generalization, are quantified and evaluated.
B. Bercean, Rafael Medelean, A. Tenescu et al.· Journal of imaging informati...· 0 citations
An architecture-agnostic framework is proposed that augments VLM inputs with spatially localized, disc-level anomaly heatmaps generated by a semi-supervised U-Net++ model that improves anatomical sensitivity through explicit visual grounding and provides an independent interpretability output for clinical oversight, mo...
Bruno Palau, Franziska Vogt, Daria Laslo et al.· 0 citations
Through controlled within-organ comparisons, it is empirically demonstrate that widespread or high-contrast abnormalities, such as devices and effusions, are reliably recovered and small, low-contrast focal lesions remain a persistent challenge across all evaluated encoders.
Maulik Chevli, Johannes Brandt, R. Braren et al.· 0 citations
A four-centre benchmark comprising 3,021 CCTA series from 818 patient-report pairs to evaluate seven open-source three-dimensional vision-language models provides a standardized setting for model comparison, while CSM enables clinically structured evaluation of finding agreement and anatomical specificity.
Zhi-Yu Ye, Yue Sun, Li-Miao Zou et al.· 0 citations
The new ChartNet training dataset could improve the accuracy of vision-language models that help analyze business trends or interpret scientific figures.