Skip to content

Tuning Collective Patterns to Alleviate Congestion in Shared AI Clusters

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 59 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper builds a system, REACT, that tunes the recurring pattern of data exchange between GPU nodes (known as communication collectives) in response to congestion, and improves communication performance by 13%-38% under network congestion.

Abstract

Distributed AI training involves recurring rounds of data exchange between multiple pairs of GPU nodes. Slowdown in even one flow due to congestion can cause the entire communication round to slowdown. Current approaches for evading congestion in AI clusters assume global control over the entire workload (e.g. coordinating the schedule of all jobs) or assume infrastructural support (e.g. adaptive routing in switches). They are thus ill-suited in a shared cloud setting where AI jobs belonging to one user can face external congestion from other users'jobs or background traffic beyond its own control. In this paper, we build a system, REACT, that tunes the recurring pattern of data exchange between GPU nodes (known as communication collectives) in response to congestion. REACT works at the application (communication library) layer, where it detects congestion at runtime using readily available flow stats, and tunes the collective pattern to alleviate congestion - changing the set of incident flows while retaining the semantics of information exchange (e.g. selecting which node aggregates data in an AllReduce tree). REACT requires no explicit support from the underlying network infrastructure and can be unilaterally deployed by individual users in a shared cloud setting. We prototype REACT as a shim layer over NCCL, and evaluate it on a shared academic GPU cluster - enabling REACT improves communication performance (algorithm bandwidth) by 13%-38% under network congestion. Our simulations across a range of congestion scenarios further reveal up to 75% performance improvement, highlighting the effectiveness of our approach.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Oct 2026

Ofan: Optimal Load Balancing for AI Training

Ofan, a switch-based destination-aware LB scheme that can reach $O(1)$ queueing, is suggested, a switch-based destination-aware LB scheme that can reach $O(1)$ queueing.

Sarah McClure, E. Cohen, Jakob Krebs et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

VarioPath: Workload-Aware All-to-All Communication for PCIe GPU Clusters

VarioPath, an efficient AlltoAllv scheduling framework for PCIe GPU systems that combines an offline topology-aware analyzer with an online demand-aware scheduler, and shows average AlltoAllv speedups of 5.88x over FAST and 1.72x over DeepEP.

Yao Fei, Jin Fang, Si-Ze Zheng et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

Zepp: Accelerating Distributed MoE Serving under Relaxed Balance Constraints

As Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models continue to scale, serving them increasingly relies on expert parallelism (EP) across a growing number of devices. Yet skewed expert workloads create imbalance across computation, communication, and memory, making load balancing a central optimization objective in distributed MoE serv...

Chang Chen, Andrew Yang, Tian-Cheng Chen et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

DLB: Distributed Load Balancing at Scale for Generative AI Inference

DLB, the Distributed Load Balancer is introduced, a novel system designed to minimize end-to-end user latency for large-scale, heterogeneous workloads and its design choices and practical experiences gained from the system in production are detailed.

S. Balseiro, B. Wydrowski, Sameer Agarwal et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 28, 2026

Making machines that can listen

Professor Paris Smaragdis develops computers with superhuman hearing for applications like speech recognition, music understanding, and environmental monitoring.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.