AutoPref is presented, the first LLM-guided framework for automated preference-objective discovery in NCO, which consistently outperforms strong hand-designed baselines across problem scales, demonstrating the benefits and scalability of automated objective discovery for NCO.
Abstract
Combinatorial optimization problems (COPs) underpin many real-world decisions, but their exponentially large search spaces make high-quality solutions costly to obtain. Neural combinatorial optimization (NCO) learns fast construction policies, typically with reinforcement learning (RL), while preference-based NCO improves sample efficiency by learning from relative solution quality. However, existing preference objectives combine two distinct design choices in manually specified, one-size-fits-all formulations: what learning signal to extract from each solution pair and how to weight each pair relative to the sampled set. We present AutoPref, the first LLM-guided framework for automated preference-objective discovery in NCO. AutoPref factorizes the objective into a pairwise loss program, which defines the learning signal, and a set-aware weighting program, which determines each pair's relative contribution. Their composition forms a unified programmatic objective space containing existing preference objectives as special cases. To make its search tractable, we introduce a staged conditional search strategy with behavioral gates that filter inadmissible programs before short-horizon training and evaluation. Across TSP, CVRP, FFSP, and JSSP, AutoPref consistently outperforms strong hand-designed baselines across problem scales, demonstrating the benefits and scalability of automated objective discovery for NCO.
Experiments show that MECo achieves the lowest mean costs compared with eight automated heuristic design baselines under the same budgets, and integrating the framework of MECo with different AHD methods improves their ID and OOD performance in both families, supporting its effectiveness across different methods.
Zhuo-Liang Xie, Chang-Liang Zhou, Geng-Hui Li et al.· 0 citations
Teacher-Guided Learning NSGA-II (TGL-NSGA-II), a low-fidelity framework for constrained Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML) neural architecture search, achieves the largest mean hypervolume and smallest generational distance on keyword spotting, records the lowest mean false-positive rate on BirdCLEF, and runs 2.2x faster t...
Pairwise comparison is a standard method for eliciting user preferences in recommender systems and group decision-making. The number of required comparisons grows quadratically with the number of alternatives, creating a substantial burden for users and platforms. This paper asks whether Hodge decomposition, which spli...
Eskander Bejaoui, M. O. Aoueileyine, R. Bouallègue· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
Reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR) usually optimizes answer correctness, yet useful language-model behavior also requires high-quality reasoning and concise responses. Existing multi-reward post-training methods typically scalarize rewards or combine specialists without explicitly protecting a reward...
Doseok Jang, Jon Ander Campos, You-Ran Qi· 0 citations
Neural combinatorial optimization (NCO) relies on parallel solution sampling for training, yet existing methods fail to fully exploit the rich information latent in a co-sampled solution group. Preference-optimization methods anchor on the single best solution and discard fine-grained quality and structural signal from...
Yuan-Yu Li, Jin-Tao Xu, Zijiang Liu et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes \methodname, a stability-guided active-set controller for controlled objective admission, a stability-guided active-set controller for controlled objective admission in reward-vector RLHF, which positions objective-entry timing as a concrete control variable in reward-vector RLHF.
Yong-Qi Tong, Z. Zhang, Ruirui Wang et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.