2026· Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics· pp. 37664-37679· 2 citations· 33 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
It is proposed that modulating the decoding temperature and monitoring how the probability distributions respond can better probe the intrinsic discrepancies between two types of text to better probe the intrinsic discrepancies between two types of text.
Abstract
The widespread deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred significant progress in the detection of LLM-generated text. However, existing detection methods often rely on statistical features that are insufficient for reliable detection; for example, even though LLM-generated and human-written texts exhibit different probability distributions in surrogate models, they can produce nearly identical entropy values, thereby conflating the two types of text. In this paper, we propose that modulating the decoding temperature and monitoring how the probability distributions respond can better probe the intrinsic discrepancies between two types of text. Building upon this insight, we introduce a new feature termed Temperature Sensitivity (TS) and demonstrate that LLM-generated text tends to exhibit higher TS than human-written text. Finally, we propose NTS, a novel and simple zero-shot detector built upon normalized temperature sensitivity. Extensive experiments across three datasets, multiple domains, and various source models demonstrate the superior effectiveness and robustness of our proposed approach. Code avaliable at: https:/
It is shown that the strength of this signal depends on text length and sampling range: spectral evidence is clearest for long, continuous, constrained generation, while short, fragmented, mixed, and edited settings require complementary confidence and fluctuation views.
Haitong Luo, Xuying Meng, Wei-Yao Zhang et al.· 1 citation
The core of VaryBalance is that, compared to LLM-generated texts, there is a greater difference between human texts and their rewritten version via LLMs, and quantifies this through Mean Squared Deviation and distinguishes human texts and LLM-generated texts.
Xue-Cong Li, Xiao-Hong Li, Qiang Hu et al.· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
Distinguishing Large Language Model (LLM) generated text from human writing is a critical and difficult challenge. While LLMs are trained to write like humans, we hypothesize that this training leaves an indelible mark. LLMs develop a particularly strong aversion to token repetition very early in training. This bias pe...
A novel method named IED is proposed, which leverages the information gain to construct the vector of which each dimension represents the information entropy of each word, and then adopts a classifier to conduct the detection.
Xiao-Quan Yi, Hao-Zhao Wang, Jing-Cai Guo· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
The key idea is to smooth adjacent token scores to reduce their variability, while using an adaptive Lepski-type rule to select the bandwidth according to the local authorship structure, and the proposed method achieves favorable mean square error performance in estimating the underlying signal.
Yangjun Lu, Hongyi Zhou, F. Spill et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Detecting LLM-generated text remains challenging under zero-shot and training-free conditions, especially when detectors must generalize across datasets, domains, and unseen generators. While existing training-free approaches exploit language-model statistics as detection signals, they typically characterize a text thr...
Mehmet Batuhan Ozdas, Murat Osmanoglu· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.