Skip to content

DWT-Fusion: A Signal-Based Framework for Training-Free LLM-Generated Text Detection

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.22026 · 0 citations · 36 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Detecting LLM-generated text remains challenging under zero-shot and training-free conditions, especially when detectors must generalize across datasets, domains, and unseen generators. While existing training-free approaches exploit language-model statistics as detection signals, they typically characterize a text through global measures that summarize overall model behavior. Consequently, potentially informative local and multiscale variations in token-level predictability may remain underutilized. Motivated by this observation, we introduce DWT-Fusion, a training-free signal-based framework for detecting LLM-generated text using discrete wavelet analysis of token-level log-probability sequences produced by a proxy causal language model. The proposed framework analyzes these sequences through wavelet-based multiresolution signal representations and derives detection signals from localized probability dynamics. We further evaluate four training-free voting variants, including equal-weight hard voting, equal-weight soft voting, calibration-weighted hard voting, and calibration-weighted soft voting, to combine multiple wavelet configurations without training a supervised meta-classifier. We evaluate the framework on HC3, M4, and MAGE using GPT-Neo-2.7B, GPT-J-6B, Falcon-7B, and LLaMA-3-8B as proxy models. The best single wavelet configurations achieve AUROC values of 0.9872, 0.8185, and 0.7138 on HC3, M4, and MAGE, respectively. With calibration-weighted voting, the best ensemble variants further improve AUROC to 0.9919, 0.8477, and 0.7471. These findings show that DWT-based multiresolution scoring and calibration-guided voting fusion provide effective and interpretable signals for training-free LLM-generated text detection.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Unveiling Spectral Mechanisms in Training-Free LLM Text Detection

It is shown that the strength of this signal depends on text length and sampling range: spectral evidence is clearest for long, continuous, constrained generation, while short, fragmented, mixed, and edited settings require complementary confidence and fluctuation views.

Haitong Luo, Xuying Meng, Weiyao Zhang et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Beyond Token-Level Cross-Entropy: Fr\'echet Distributional Post-Training for Autoregressive Image Generation

Autoregressive image generators are commonly pretrained with token-level cross-entropy under teacher forcing, yet evaluated by the distributional quality of decoded images. This creates an objective mismatch, because categorical errors have unequal image-level consequences, and a context mismatch, because inference conditions on model-generated histories. We introduce FD-loss post-training, which adapts a pretrained discrete generator using representation-space Fr\'echet distance as the sole objective. A dual-pass scheme first constructs detached rollout contexts through gradient-free generation under the model's native inference configuration, then performs differentiable replay with a probability-level straight-through estimator (STE) that preserves hard argmax decoding in the forward pass while propagating image-level gradients through temperature-scaled probabilities. Only the generator is updated, while the tokenizer and feature extractors remain frozen. Across eight completed configurations from four generator families on class-conditional ImageNet at $256\times256$, FD-loss post-training reduces FID and $\mathrm{FD}_{r6}$ by 41.4% and 52.0% on average. The strongest FID result improves from 2.42 to 1.43 without adding parameters or inference steps.

Jin-Hua Zhang, Yist Y. Lin, Wei Long et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

LLM as Detector: An In-context Learning Approach for Tabular Anomaly Detection

LLM-Detector is proposed, a framework that utilizes the in-context learning capacity of LLMs for structured, prompt-conditioned scoring synthesis, enabling LLMs to derive anomaly detection logic from structured normal-state knowledge.

Tu Nguyen, Dang Nguyen, Thuc Duy Le et al. · 0 citations

Information Entropy for LLM-generated Text Detection

A novel method named IED is proposed, which leverages the information gain to construct the vector of which each dimension represents the information entropy of each word, and then adopts a classifier to conduct the detection.

Xiaoquan Yi, Haozhao Wang, Jingcai Guo · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

MD-ProTector: Positioning Multiple Data-Driven Prototypes for LLM-Generated Text Detection

As LLM-generated content becomes more sophisticated, detection systems for distinguishing those texts from human-written text must operate at scale while handling diverse writing styles, domains, languages, and generator models. Input-only encoder detectors are suitable for practical deployment setting, but standard binary classification supplies only the class label and does not explicitly organize the substantial variation within either class. We propose MD-ProTector, which represents each class with multiple trainable reference vectors in the encoder embedding space, referred to as prototypes. These prototypes provide separate decision boundaries for different groups of texts within the same class. However, adding multiple prototypes alone does not determine which variation each prototype should represent. MD-ProTector addresses this problem with Prototype Positioning loss, which separates class-level structure from the within-class variation that differentiates individual prototypes. Evaluated across five settings from three large-scale benchmarks covering domain, generator, language, and adversarial variation, MD-ProTector achieves the highest AvgRec on MAGE CDCM and RAID and the highest AUROC and lowest FPR95 on RAID among the compared encoder-based methods.

J. Han, Jimin Hong, C. Moon et al. · 0 citations

VaryBalance: Detecting LLM-generated Text through Variation

The core of VaryBalance is that, compared to LLM-generated texts, there is a greater difference between human texts and their rewritten version via LLMs, and quantifies this through Mean Squared Deviation and distinguishes human texts and LLM-generated texts.

Xuecong Li, Xiaohong Li, Qiang Hu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.