Aug 2026· Journal of Neurology· Vol 273· 0 citations· 64 references
Medicine
TL;DR
Potential causes of breakthrough ischemic stroke are identifiable in about half of breakthrough strokes and are associated with higher risk of recurrence compared with those without, warranting individualized approaches.
Abstract
Oral anticoagulants (OACs), including vitamin K antagonists and direct OACs, reduce stroke risk in atrial fibrillation (AF), yet breakthrough ischemic stroke still occurs in 1–2% of patients annually despite adequate therapy. The mechanisms underlying these events remain unclear. We aimed to identify potential causes of breakthrough ischemic stroke and assess their impact on outcomes, with a focus on drug interactions. ASPERA-R is a multicenter retrospective study including patients with ischemic stroke despite ongoing OAC therapy for AF (February 2020–February 2025). Ongoing treatment was defined by DOAC last intake within 48 h or therapeutic INR levels for VKAs. Potential causes included interacting drugs, active cancer, and competing etiologies. Ninety-day outcomes were compared between patients with and without ≥ 1 potential cause using adjusted Cox regression. Inverse probability-weighted analyses (IPW) evaluated the impact of interacting drugs. Among 1649 patients (median age 80.4 years [IQR 73.2–85.6]; 860 [52.2%] female), most were on DOACs (1275; 77.3%), and 724 (43.9%) had ≥ 1 potential cause. Interacting drugs were identified in 28.4%, competing etiologies in 24.3%, and cancer in 4.4% cases. Patients with one or more potential cause had a higher risk of recurrent ischemic stroke at 90 days (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.18–3.53) compared with those without, with no differences in other outcomes. In the IPW analyses, interacting drugs were associated with increased myocardial infarction risk (HR 3.26, 95% CI 1.30–8.17). Potential causes are identifiable in about half of breakthrough strokes and are associated with higher risk of recurrence compared with those without. Improved detection and management of these factors may reduce recurrence risk, warranting individualized approaches.
BACKGROUND
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred over VKA for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), but concerns exist regarding their use in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The safety and effectiveness of DOACs in AF patients with isolated lupus anticoagulant (LA) who do not meet APS crite...
Omar Obeidat, Laith Alhuneafat, Mohamed F. Ismail et al.· American Journal of the Medi...· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Despite the growing use of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, large-scale studies assessing the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation (OAC) after ablation, particularly in patients with high stroke risk, remain limited.
METHODS
This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients from the Chi...
Lan Ren, Xiao-Dong Peng, Si-Tong Li et al.· Journal of the American Hear...· 0 citations
Introduction and Objectives: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and prior ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at high risk of recurrent thromboembolic events. Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have progressively replaced vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), it remains uncertain whether prior s...
Janusz Bednarski, Michał Wojewódzki, M. Szewczak et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
Background: Frailty complicates anticoagulation management in older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly when long-term vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy is already established. Whether switching to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) improves outcomes in this setting remains uncertain, and guideline re...
P. Karakasis, Ricardo Gómez-Huelgas, Stylianos Tzeis et al.· Medical Science· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.