Skip to content
Book Open access

Exposure-Based Reinforcement Learning to Rank

Jul 2026 · International Conference on the Theory of Information Retrieval · pp. 262-273 · 0 citations · 63 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work considerably improves RL for LTR methodology by increasing its effectiveness, efficiency, and ease of application, and proposes an abstraction that places gradient estimation behind a document-exposure distribution that enables seamless plug-and-play integration with auto-differentiation.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) methods for learning-to-rank (LTR) can optimize (almost) any ranking goal, e.g., from precision or discounted cumulative gain to fairness-of-exposure or ranking distillation. However, standard RL is ineffective and computationally costly due to the enormous action space in LTR settings. Existing methods reach computational efficiency through custom gradient computation algorithms, but they are very complex to implement and often clash with auto-differentiation. Consequently, existing RL for LTR is not attractive to many practitioners. We reconsider RL for LTR while actively avoiding reliance on custom gradients. Contrary to the existing approaches, we focus on variance reduction and GPU computation. In doing so, we discover that high sample-efficiency can be reached through baseline corrections and partial marginalization. Furthermore, we propose an abstraction that places gradient estimation behind a document-exposure distribution, this enables seamless plug-and-play integration with auto-differentiation. Thereby, one only has to implement a loss as a differentiable function of exposure and RL for LTR can optimize it using auto-differentiation. Our experimental results reveal that our new exposure-based RL for LTR approach converges considerably faster and at significantly higher ranking performance than existing custom gradients, with no additional costs in computation time when using GPUs. In contrast, existing custom gradients result in severe stability issues when converging over many epochs, which never occur for our methods. Thus, we considerably improve RL for LTR methodology by increasing its effectiveness, efficiency, and ease of application.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Expert-Space Exploration in MoE Reinforcement Learning

ESRL is introduced, an architecture-aware framework that explicitly explores the expert-routing space of MoE models, and preserves high-confidence experts as anchors, and restricts stochastic routing to a plausible candidate pool, thereby retaining reliable computation paths.

Hong-Yi He, Zheng-Wen Lin, Xiao Liu et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

EmbodiedMind: Adaptive Data Curation and Prefix-Tree Reinforcement Learning for Efficient Embodied Intelligence

Trie-GRPO, a novel reinforcement learning algorithm based on action prefix trees, which enables step-level advantage estimation, is introduced, which resolves the credit assignment problem by isolating intermediate correct decisions from downstream errors, while effectively balancing exploration efficiency and depth co...

Fei-Fan Wang, Zong-Bing Zhang, Yu Zhang et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Towards Better Training Signal: Advantage Clipped Policy Optimization

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a cornerstone for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), but the need for on-policy data substantially limits training efficiency. Reusing off-policy data through importance sampling (IS) can improve efficiency but introduce considerable instability....

Rui-Chuan Huang, Jing-Han Liu, Cong-Liang Chen · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

MaD-RL: Matching Distributions for Calibrating LLMs with Reinforcement Learning

This work proposes a general RL-based framework for Distribution Matching allowing matching the distribution of a latent categorical attribute of model outputs to a specified target distribution and proposes reward functions for other divergences such as KL and Jensen-Shannon and motivate them with theoretical justific...

Sourabh Kulkarni, Ksheeraj Sai Vepuri, B. Demir et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Mitigating the Length-Scaling Tax with Online Distillation

Length scaling during reinforcement-learning (RL) post-training is often viewed as a sign of improved reasoning ability, especially on difficult problems, but may also make responses to already-solved problems unnecessarily verbose. We quantify this side effect as the length-scaling tax (LST): excess response length on...

Xu Wan, Wen-Yue Xu, Sheng-Jie Zhao et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Timestep Weighting: A Hidden Key to Effective ELBO-Based Flow-Matching RL

ELBO-based reinforcement learning offers a sampler-agnostic approach to fine-tuning flow matching models with reward feedback. Timestep weighting in ELBO-based RL has large impact on performance, and it also provides a unified view (as we show in this work) to understand prediction losses heuristically chosen in prior...

Qin-Wei Ma, Jing-Zhe Shi, Si-Min Fan et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.