Skip to content

Expert-Space Exploration in MoE Reinforcement Learning

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 37 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

ESRL is introduced, an architecture-aware framework that explicitly explores the expert-routing space of MoE models, and preserves high-confidence experts as anchors, and restricts stochastic routing to a plausible candidate pool, thereby retaining reliable computation paths.

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) has become central to post-training of large language models. Recent advances in RL for Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have primarily focused on improving optimization stability and training efficiency, while treating the expert selection as a fixed component. Since routing determines the sparse computation paths that induce output distributions, expert selection offers an additional source of rollout diversity. Through empirical analysis, we find that perturbing expert routing effectively alters model output and increases rollout diversity, which is similar to increasing the decoding temperature. However, direct perturbation can activate unsuitable experts and substantially degrade rollout quality. Motivated by these observations, we introduce Expert-Space Exploration Reinforcement Learning (ESRL), an architecture-aware framework that explicitly explores the expert-routing space of MoE models. ESRL preserves high-confidence experts as anchors, and restricts stochastic routing to a plausible candidate pool, thereby retaining reliable computation paths. The perturbation strength is further adapted according to router entropy to avoid over-perturbation. To mitigate the routing mismatch introduced by perturbation, ESRL records the expert paths used during rollout and replays them during policy optimization. Experiments demonstrate that ESRL achieves the best performance across MoE backbones with top-K, top-1, and shared-expert routing, as well as across mathematics, science, and code tasks without additional sampling or computational cost. Specifically, ESRL on Qwen3-30B-A3B achieves the best among all compared methods, improving average Pass@1 and Pass@8 over GRPO by 3.2 and 4.5 percentage points, respectively. Further analyses of expert utilization and training dynamics provide insights into how exploiting MoE-specific routing structure benefits RL training.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

RLDISCOVER: LLM-driven co-evolution of reinforcement learning algorithms

LLM-guided program evolution has enabled discoveries in mathematics and computational optimization, raising the prospect of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms that self-evolve to improve how agents learn. However, realizing this prospect faces two obstacles. Joint search over coupled algorithmic components is diffi...

Hao-Ran Li, Z. Ge, Xiao-Ming Yuan et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Structuring MoE Expert Selection for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Long-horizon LLM agents are frequently implemented using sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) models, yet the co-design of agentic behavior and MoE structures remains underexplored. In this work, we comprehensively study the connections between agentic post-training and MoE expert selection. In off-the-shelf MoE models, we...

Bo-Lian Li, Ting-Yao Hu, Cheng-Yu Hsieh et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Difficulty-Adaptive Tree-Structured Policy Optimization for Expanding Reasoning Coverage in RLVR

DATPO (Difficulty-Adaptive Sentence-entropy-guided Tree-structured Policy Optimization) integrates difficulty-adaptive tree search with a sibling-diversity advantage term, explicitly promoting semantic diversity to expand reasoning coverage during training.

Young Kyu Yu, Sanghwan Jang, Hwanjo Yu · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Rationale-Guided Policy Optimization: Learning to Reason with Adaptive Rationale Scaffolding

On-policy reinforcement learning has become a central paradigm for improving the reasoning abilities of large language models. However, its effectiveness is often limited by reward sparsity: when a model fails to discover correct trajectories for difficult problems, the optimization process receives little useful signa...

Hoang Phan, M. Pham, Chau Pham et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Decoupling Exploration from Optimization in RLVR

Modern language models undergo reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) on top of already-trained checkpoints. A key promise of RLVR is the discovery of new reasoning strategies. In principle, a model can sample novel ideas absent from its prior training data. In practice, however, augmenting RLVR with str...

Saif Punjwani, Micah Goldblum · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 22, 2026

Flint-interactive: A language for creating interactive data visualizations

Flint-interactive gives AI agents a language for creating interactive visualizations. Click a chart, filter data, highlight related content, and explore beyond the view the author originally chose. The post Flint-interactive: A language for creating interactive data visualizations appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 15, 2026

AI model decodes the language cells use to communicate

A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 15, 2026

Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar

Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.