This work connects papers in a graph whose edges are typed by these four facets, derived from facet items and citation signals, and distil it into a generative retriever whose identifiers are the papers'own facet text.
Abstract
Scientific papers may relate by problem, method, result, or contribution, but document-level retrievers collapse these into a single similarity score without saying why they are related. Citation- and similarity-based retrieval alone also confines search to the neighbourhood of what is already known, whereas generative retrieval generates document identifiers directly, enabling the exploratory retrieval that scientific discovery depends on. We connect papers in a graph whose edges are typed by these four facets, derived from facet items and citation signals, and distil it into a generative retriever whose identifiers are the papers'own facet text. Two graph properties do not survive naive distillation. First, because every training pair is an edge, naive enumeration indexes just 84% of the corpus. Coverage-aware distillation makes every paper learnable through a reverse-neighbour fallback, a minimum-coverage threshold, and edge-importance weighting. Second, constrained decoding guarantees that every generated identifier is a valid paper, but not that the graph connects it to the query. Graph-weighted reciprocal rank fusion scales each candidate's rank term by its query-candidate edge weight, dropping unsupported ones. On LitWeave, our constructed corpus of 11,359 NLP papers, Graft recovers 91% of its graph teacher's Recall@20 with no nearest-neighbour index or encoder at inference, and outperforms the graph teacher on query papers outside the corpus. It reproduces the graph's own facet labels at 0.922 precision, so every returned paper arrives labelled with the facet that surfaced it rather than an opaque score.
Most automated survey generation systems retrieve papers as flat documents, limiting their ability to capture research structure. We present SurveyGraph, a framework built around a Methods-Entity Knowledge Graph (MEKG) encoding method-level follow-on, competition, and shared-resource relations. The graph supports core-...
Yi-Fan Yuan, Yan-Cheng Zhu, Zuo-Yu Zhang et al.· 0 citations
This work studies what shapes citation in two 90-day collections of answers to commercial questions in contrasting markets, and controlled experiments show that brand names reorder its rankings of products with identical facts.
RATIO (Retrieval Across Typed Ideation Operations), a large-scale benchmark in which relevance is defined by three operations which are name ideation moves, provides a scalable training and evaluation framework for retrieval components that support literature-grounded ideation, opening up new research avenues on scient...
A novel framework KD-GAG is proposed that efficiently constructs KGs by distilling teacher LLMs' semantics and reasoning into a smaller student LLM and a preference-based subgraph pruning method to optimize the retrieval process.
Long Zhao, Yin Xu, Yan-Yan Wang et al.· Neural Networks· 0 citations
EvoTree is proposed, a staged framework that decouples conceptual backbone learning from temporal refinement and is the only method with non-trivial marginal-paper detection on the annotated set, and is the only method with non-trivial marginal-paper detection on the annotated set.
This work introduces MUSES, a million-instance benchmark for prospective intellectual-roots retrieval over a fixed 2.33M-paper corpus, and releases CiteRoots, both CiteRoots layers, and a distilled open companion judge for future work on prospective retrieval and intellectual roots.
Rohan Pandey, Sunjae Kwon, Hong Yu· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.