Skip to content
Preprint

GRAFT: Graph-Distilled Generative Retrieval for Facet-Aware Scientific Literature Exploration

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 53 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work connects papers in a graph whose edges are typed by these four facets, derived from facet items and citation signals, and distil it into a generative retriever whose identifiers are the papers'own facet text.

Abstract

Scientific papers may relate by problem, method, result, or contribution, but document-level retrievers collapse these into a single similarity score without saying why they are related. Citation- and similarity-based retrieval alone also confines search to the neighbourhood of what is already known, whereas generative retrieval generates document identifiers directly, enabling the exploratory retrieval that scientific discovery depends on. We connect papers in a graph whose edges are typed by these four facets, derived from facet items and citation signals, and distil it into a generative retriever whose identifiers are the papers'own facet text. Two graph properties do not survive naive distillation. First, because every training pair is an edge, naive enumeration indexes just 84% of the corpus. Coverage-aware distillation makes every paper learnable through a reverse-neighbour fallback, a minimum-coverage threshold, and edge-importance weighting. Second, constrained decoding guarantees that every generated identifier is a valid paper, but not that the graph connects it to the query. Graph-weighted reciprocal rank fusion scales each candidate's rank term by its query-candidate edge weight, dropping unsupported ones. On LitWeave, our constructed corpus of 11,359 NLP papers, Graft recovers 91% of its graph teacher's Recall@20 with no nearest-neighbour index or encoder at inference, and outperforms the graph teacher on query papers outside the corpus. It reproduces the graph's own facet labels at 0.922 precision, so every returned paper arrives labelled with the facet that surfaced it rather than an opaque score.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2026

SurveyGraph: Generating Academic Surveys via Methods-Entity Knowledge Graphs

Most automated survey generation systems retrieve papers as flat documents, limiting their ability to capture research structure. We present SurveyGraph, a framework built around a Methods-Entity Knowledge Graph (MEKG) encoding method-level follow-on, competition, and shared-resource relations. The graph supports core-...

Yi-Fan Yuan, Yan-Cheng Zhu, Zuo-Yu Zhang et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Aug 2026

RATIO: A Benchmark for Retrieval Across Typed Ideation Operations in Scientific Literature

RATIO (Retrieval Across Typed Ideation Operations), a large-scale benchmark in which relevance is defined by three operations which are name ideation moves, provides a scalable training and evaluation framework for retrieval components that support literature-grounded ideation, opening up new research avenues on scient...

Ms. S. Sharon, Tom Hope · 0 citations
Sep 2026

KD-GAG: Knowledge-distilled graph-augmented generation via preference-aware subgraph pruning.

A novel framework KD-GAG is proposed that efficiently constructs KGs by distilling teacher LLMs' semantics and reasoning into a smaller student LLM and a preference-based subgraph pruning method to optimize the retrieval process.

Long Zhao, Yin Xu, Yan-Yan Wang et al. · 0 citations

Towards Automatic Evolution Tree Generation from Citation Graphs

EvoTree is proposed, a staged framework that decouples conceptual backbone learning from temporal refinement and is the only method with non-trivial marginal-paper detection on the annotated set, and is the only method with non-trivial marginal-paper detection on the annotated set.

Ze-Xing Zhao, Yun-Tong Hu, Liang Zhao · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

MUSES: A Benchmark for Prospective Intellectual-Roots Retrieval

This work introduces MUSES, a million-instance benchmark for prospective intellectual-roots retrieval over a fixed 2.33M-paper corpus, and releases CiteRoots, both CiteRoots layers, and a distilled open companion judge for future work on prospective retrieval and intellectual roots.

Rohan Pandey, Sunjae Kwon, Hong Yu · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.