Skip to content
#reinforcement learning Dataset Open access

This dataset supports the paper "Cardinality-Adaptive Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Variable-Scale Cooperative Aerial Games"

Sep 2026 · Figshare

Abstract

This dataset supports the paper "Cardinality-Adaptive Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Variable-Scale Cooperative Aerial Games" (submitted to Applied Intelligence). It contains the complete training and evaluation records of CA-MAPPO, a cardinality-adaptive multi-agent proximal policy optimization algorithm for variable-scale cooperative aerial-game formations, generated with the JSBSim six-degree-of-freedom flight-dynamics engine in the loop.The dataset includes: (1) per-iteration training logs (episode return, periodic win rate, policy/value losses, entropy, KL divergence; JSONL) from three-seed main training runs and the gated three-stage curriculum (single-scale consolidation at 2v2, mixed-scale main stage on {2v2, 3v3, 5v5}, and ace-weighted final consolidation), covering trained scales and strictly held-out zero-shot scales {4v4, 6v6}; (2) paired evaluation results (win/draw/loss counts with Wilson confidence intervals; JSON) for CA-MAPPO, MAPPO, QMIX and ablation variants, organized by opponent level (L1–L4) × team size under a common-random-number protocol with 20 episodes per cell, plus zero-shot extrapolation evaluations at 10v10, 14v14 and 20v20; (3) ablation study data (without geometric attention bias, without set-attention critic, single-scale training, without per-scale advantage normalization, without win-rate-gated curriculum, UPDeT-faithful adaptation, and double-budget controls); (4) full-episode step-by-step simulation records (per-step state, hybrid action, reward, termination flag, and flight parameters for every agent); (5) automated maneuver-detector statistics behind the emergent-tactics analysis and self-attention weight maps (NPZ) behind the attention-analysis figures.The dataset contains raw data only — no figures, no plotted curves, no trained model weights.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.