It is argued that drug resistance is critically shaped by cancer cell plasticity, which varies widely among patients and contributes to heterogeneous therapeutic efficacy, and a next‐generation precision oncology paradigm integrating stratified diagnosis, rational combination intervention, and adaptive monitoring is proposed.
Abstract
Tumor heterogeneity creates selective pressures and ecological niches that enable cancer cell plasticity; conversely, plasticity continuously generates and reshapes heterogeneity. Together, these processes drive tumor progression, therapeutic resistance, recurrence, and divergent clinical outcomes, thereby limiting the durability of precision oncology. In this Review, we synthesize recent advances in our understanding tumor heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity across spatial, temporal, and molecular scales, and discuss how the tumor microenvironment regulates plasticity through physical, chemical, and biological cues. We further outline three fundamental challenges for precision therapy, namely, target loss, bypass pathway activation, and adaptive cell‐state transitions, and argue that drug resistance is critically shaped by cancer cell plasticity, which varies widely among patients and contributes to heterogeneous therapeutic efficacy. Building on this framework, we propose a next‐generation precision‐oncology paradigm integrating stratified diagnosis, rational combination intervention, and adaptive monitoring. Finally, we discuss how the integration of single‐cell and spatial multiomics, together with artificial intelligence, could enable the development of “digital twin” tumor models to guide individualized therapeutic decision‐making. Collectively, this review provides an integrated conceptual foundation and practical roadmap for overcoming key bottlenecks in precision oncology driven by tumor heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity.
This review synthesizes key advances in understanding tumor heterogeneity: from its cellular origins and molecular mechanisms to its multidimensional manifestation in the tumor microenvironment and from metastatic heterogeneity to the fundamental causes of treatment resistance.
Jianhong Zhang, Heng Li, S. Ru et al.· Signal Transduction and Targ...· 1 citation
Tumor plasticity and microenvironmental heterogeneity are established as an integrated, evolving system that fuels metastasis and limits durable treatment responses.
G. Dagar, M. Dagar, Ashna Gupta et al.· MedComm· 0 citations
A particular focus on the bidirectional interplay between CSCs and the tumor immune microenvironment is focused on, which may provide a conceptual framework for the development of more rational combination strategies, although their clinical benefit remains to be validated.
Jingyu Tan, Tao Wen, Jian Liu et al.· Journal of Hematology & Onco...· 0 citations
Current insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying TME remodeling are summarized, including ECM mechanotransduction, hypoxia-driven signaling, hypoxia-driven signaling, epigenetic regulation, metabolic reprogramming, and extracellular vesicle-mediated communication.
Xiaoying Li, Shuang Dai, Dan Cao et al.· Frontiers in Cell and Develo...· 0 citations
The evidence demonstrates that growth factor signalling, inflammatory pathways, hypoxia, metabolic reprogramming, genetic and epigenetic alterations, and extracellular vesicle-mediated communication alter the tumour microenvironment, encouraging tumour growth, metastasis, immune escape, and resistance to immunotherapy,...
Dr. Gopalaxmi Nath, Moumita Ghosh, Dr Shahid Ahmad Shergojry et al.· Genetics and Molecular Resea...· 0 citations
The models and drivers of tumor evolution are discussed, focusing on how cancer cells adapt and evolve under multidimensional selective pressure, including the intracellular, extracellular, and exogenous levels.
Kun-Yu Zhang, Xiu-Zhi Zhu, Yuxin Yan et al.· Signal Transduction and Targ...· 2 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.