Skip to content
Review Open access

Tumor evolution: signaling pathways, molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets

Jul 2026 · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · Vol 11 · 2 citations · 422 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The models and drivers of tumor evolution are discussed, focusing on how cancer cells adapt and evolve under multidimensional selective pressure, including the intracellular, extracellular, and exogenous levels.

Abstract

Cancer is one of the leading causes of global morbidity and mortality and is characterized by its high heterogeneity, genomic instability and adaptive plasticity. Applying Darwin’s theory of evolution, the concept of tumor evolution has improved our understanding of the biological behavior of advanced cancer, while technological limitations have long left how to dynamically characterize the evolutionary process unsolved. In recent years, the development of high-throughput sequencing, single-cell and spatial omics, lineage tracing, computational modeling, and noninvasive biopsy technology has helped explain tumor heterogeneity and track the evolutionary trajectory of tumors, which has attracted widespread attention in tumor evolution. Here, we discuss the models and drivers of tumor evolution, focusing on how cancer cells adapt and evolve under multidimensional selective pressure, including the intracellular, extracellular, and exogenous levels. We further summarize key signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms involved in genomic instability, epigenetic regulation, metabolic reprogramming, tumor microenvironment remodeling, immune escape and therapy-induced selection. In addition, emerging therapeutic strategies guided by tumor evolution are also discussed, emphasizing that the identification of key genetic and epigenetic targets, together with dynamic monitoring of clonal changes, is crucial for overcoming treatment resistance and improving patient outcomes. By systematically summarizing the signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms underlying tumor evolution, this review aims to provide new targets and conceptual frameworks for promoting precision treatment strategies in oncology in the future.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Aug 2026

Transforming Cancer Treatment: Integrative Strategies Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment through Biological Innovation and Artificial Intelligence.

This review comprehensively examines the cellular and acellular architecture of the TME, emphasizing its spatial organization, metabolic reprogramming, mechanical properties, and immunological regulation across diverse tumor types.

R. Latif, Taufiq Nawaz · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Targeting tumor transition windows

Tumor heterogeneity and cellular plasticity are major drivers of therapeutic failure across many cancer types. While precision oncology has largely focused on static genomic alterations, growing evidence indicates that tumors behave as dynamic biological systems that continuously adapt during treatment. Tumor cell populations can transition between distinct functional states under therapeutic pressure, including transient drug-tolerant phenotypes that may precede stabilization of genetically or epigenetically resistant clones. These transitions are shaped by mechanisms such as epigenetic reprogramming, stress-response signaling, metabolic rewiring, and microenvironmental interactions. This review synthesizes findings from tumor plasticity, drug-tolerant persister biology, therapy-induced vulnerabilities, clonal evolution, and adaptive therapy to examine how temporal tumor dynamics influence treatment response. Emerging evidence suggests that some tumors may pass through short-lived phases of cellular instability during therapy in which molecular dependencies, stress-response programs, or adaptive survival states are altered before resistance becomes genetically or epigenetically stabilized. However, such transition states should be considered therapeutically actionable only when linked to functional evidence of altered drug sensitivity, pathway dependence, immune susceptibility, or clinical response. Advances in single-cell transcriptomics, epigenomic profiling, serial circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA)/cfDNA analysis, multi-omics integration, and dynamic imaging are enabling longitudinal monitoring of tumor state transitions and may facilitate identification of transient biological states preceding stable resistance. Integrating temporal tumor biology with therapeutic sequencing strategies, adaptive treatment schedules, and biomarker-guided monitoring may therefore help test whether specific adaptive states can be therapeutically exploited and may refine precision oncology approaches.

Ola A. Al-Ewaidat, Moawiah M. Naffaa · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Dynamic tumor microenvironment remodeling in cancer therapy resistance: molecular mechanisms and translational opportunities

Current insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying TME remodeling are summarized, including ECM mechanotransduction, hypoxia-driven signaling, hypoxia-driven signaling, epigenetic regulation, metabolic reprogramming, and extracellular vesicle-mediated communication.

Xiaoying Li, Shuang Dai, Dan Cao et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Stemness plasticity in hepatocellular carcinoma: spatial niches and therapeutic implications.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a major global health burden, with therapeutic resistance limiting the long-term efficacy of current treatments. Although cancer stem cell (CSC) models have been proposed to explain tumor initiation and relapse, strategies targeting marker-defined CSC populations have shown limited clinical benefit. Increasing evidence indicates that stemness in HCC is not a fixed cellular trait but a dynamic and reversible state that can be induced, maintained, and re-established under therapeutic pressure. This stemness plasticity is regulated by tumor-intrinsic signaling pathways, including TGF-β, YAP/TAZ, and Wnt/β-catenin, and stabilized by epigenetic and post-transcriptional mechanisms such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification. In parallel, spatially organized tumor microenvironmental niches composed of cancer-associated fibroblasts, macrophages, and endothelial cells provide critical signals that support stem-like phenotypes and immune evasion. These interconnected mechanisms collectively contribute to therapeutic resistance and tumor progression. This review synthesizes current evidence linking stemness plasticity to spatial niche regulation and treatment failure in HCC, and outlines a therapeutic framework that integrates targeting of intracellular regulatory programs with disruption of microenvironmental support systems. We further discuss the implications of this framework for the development of combination strategies and dynamic biomarkers that better capture the context-dependent nature of stemness. Together, these insights support a shift from targeting static cell populations toward targeting the regulatory processes that govern tumor cell plasticity in HCC.

H. Ahn, Sujin Kim, H. Cho · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.