Skip to content

Curricular Integration as a Foundation for Clinical Reasoning Development

Aug 2026 · Journal of Athletic Training Education and Practice · Vol 22, pp. 238-244 · 1 citation · 26 references

TL;DR

This commentary examines intentional curricular integration, specifically the concurrent teaching of examination, diagnosis, and patient management, as a structural approach to creating opportunities for clinical reasoning development and describes several feasible curricular integration models.

Abstract

Clinical reasoning, defined as the thinking and decision-making processes that underpin clinical practice, is a critical outcome of health professions education. Clinical reasoning occurs across diagnostic, therapeutic, and contextual decision-making throughout complete episodes of patient care and develops through repeated engagement with authentic clinical problems. This commentary examines intentional curricular integration, specifically the concurrent teaching of examination, diagnosis, and patient management, as a structural approach to creating opportunities for clinical reasoning development. Curricular structures that fragment examination, diagnosis, and patient management may limit opportunities for learners to practice clinical reasoning in ways that reflect real-world clinical practice. Although instructional strategies such as case-based learning, problem-based learning, and simulation can support clinical reasoning development, their effectiveness may be influenced by how they are embedded within the broader curricular structure. Drawing on literature from across health professions and athletic training education, we describe several feasible curricular integration models, including integrated courses, parallel course delivery, and sequenced but intentionally linked courses. These approaches provide different mechanisms for intentionally connecting examination, diagnosis, and patient management across complete episodes of care. Curricular integration can increase opportunities for students to engage concurrently in diagnostic, therapeutic, and contextual reasoning and clinical decision-making across complete episodes of care. Athletic training programs should consider intentionally structuring curricula around complete episodes of care and reinforcing integrated reasoning across both didactic and clinical education experiences. Integration may be achieved through multiple approaches and does not require wholesale curricular restructuring. By intentionally connecting examination, diagnosis, and patient management and reinforcing integrated reasoning in classroom and clinical settings, athletic training programs can increase opportunities for students to practice clinical reasoning in ways that more closely reflect real-world clinical practice.

View source

Similar papers

Review Sep 2026

Teaching and Assessing Clinical Reasoning in Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review.

Evidence on educational strategies and assessment approaches used to develop and evaluate clinical reasoning in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and physiotherapy support integrating interactive teaching approaches with structured assessment to strengthen clinical reasoning in health professions education.

Sanaa Ahmed, Maria Naz, Zarreen Raza et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Theory-informed redesign of clinical reasoning education in the era of generative artificial intelligence.

Clinical reasoning is a foundational competency that develops over the course of training and comprises two sub-components. Diagnostic reasoning classifies a patient's condition and assigns a diagnostic label, whereas management reasoning weighs multiple defensible plans with consideration of patient preferences and co...

Verity Schaye, Andrew S. Parsons, Andrew P. J. Olson et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Facilitating Critical Thinking in Undergraduate Medical Education: An Integrated Narrative Review

Critical thinking is a central goal of undergraduate medical education because students must learn to interpret evidence, question assumptions, compare competing explanations, and justify decisions under conditions of uncertainty. Although the literature contains many accounts of barriers to critical thinking, the evid...

Abdullah bin Abdulrahman Al-Bader · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Assessing the efficacy of a case-based clinical reasoning workshop for medical students: a randomized controlled trial

Clinical reasoning is a core competency in medical education, yet many undergraduate medical students struggle to develop flexible diagnostic thinking and well-organized knowledge structures. Case-based learning has been suggested as an effective approach to support the development of these skills. This study evaluated...

Reza Golchin Vafa, Aliakbar Hasani, M. Amini · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

A four-step implementation framework for professionalism competency in undergraduate medical education

An evidence-guided, theory-informed implementation framework developed during a two-year institutional improvement cycle at the College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University is described, providing a transferable four-step approach that schools can adapt while preserving the implementation se...

Munawar Farooq, M. Ljubisavljevic, Mohi Eldin Magzoub et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Learning and Autonomy in Clinical Simulation: an Integrative Conceptual Framework

Clinical simulation can integrate knowledge, skills, communication, emotions, and decision-making within a protected environment. However, its educational value is not guaranteed by simulator fidelity or scenario complexity. This article analyzes and integrates theoretical frameworks that explain the transition from su...

R. Avendaño, Jonathan Cabrera, Juan Manuel Arancibia · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.