Skip to content
#reinforcement learning Review Open access

Reinforcement Learning for Cathode Material Design Through Sequential Decision-Making Frameworks

Aug 2026 · Nanomaterials · Vol 16 · 0 citations · 78 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Reinforcement learning as a decision making technique for cathode material design has been evaluated and how RL can support the composition selection, dopant, and crystal structure optimisation is analyzed.

Abstract

The cathode material design is a persistent challenge in the development of next-generation rechargeable batteries. The cathode performance is critically influenced by certain key parameters, i.e., composition, crystal structures, ion transport, and degradation behaviour. Moreover, techno-economic and sustainable considerations also play a pivotal role in the viable cathode material design. In recent years, the integration of static machine learning models with conventional experimental techniques has significantly enhanced the cathode material design. However, the sequential nature of cathode discovery has not been fully captured by these techniques as they do not update their decision strategy based on prior outcomes. In this review, reinforcement learning (RL) as a decision making technique for cathode material design has been evaluated. Firstly, cathode design space, including major cathode families, optimisation objectives, and key material variables have been explored. Afterwards, cathode discovery has been presented in terms of RL states, actions, rewards, policies, environments, constraints, and feedback. The key focus of this review is to analyse how RL can support the composition selection, dopant, and crystal structure optimisation. The review also discusses the current limitations of RL based cathode design including data scarcity, dataset bias, limited cathode specific benchmarks, reward function design, physical validity, and experimental validations. The future directions have been proposed for physics informed and experimentally validated RL infrastructure that integrates the density functional theory, molecular dynamics, artificial intelligence and human expertise.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.