Skip to content

TRUST-ESD: A Risk-Calibrated and Governance-Aware AI Framework for Enterprise Strategic Decision Support Under Uncertainty

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.20065 · 0 citations · 26 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Ablation and case-study analyses further confirm that uncertainty calibration, downside-risk scoring, risk memory, explainability, and governance validation jointly improve trustworthy enterprise decision-making.

Abstract

Enterprise strategic decision support requires AI systems that are not only accurate, but also uncertainty-aware, risk-calibrated, explainable, and governance-compliant. This paper proposes TRUST-ESD, a risk-calibrated and governance-aware framework for enterprise decision support under uncertainty. TRUST-ESD evaluates feasible counterfactual strategies through predictive utility estimation, conformal uncertainty calibration, CVaR-based downside-risk scoring, risk-memory retrieval, policy-as-code governance, explainability, and human oversight. Unlike prediction-only methods that select actions by maximum expected utility, TRUST-ESD recommends strategies that balance value, reliability, risk exposure, and compliance. Experimental results show that TRUST-ESD improves risk-adjusted utility by 7.95%, reduces risk exposure by 23.22%, reduces CVaR by 23.78%, lowers calibration error by 13.89%, improves explanation fidelity by 10.90%, and increases governance compliance by 9.76% compared with strong uncertainty-aware baselines, while maintaining competitive predictive accuracy. Ablation and case-study analyses further confirm that uncertainty calibration, downside-risk scoring, risk memory, explainability, and governance validation jointly improve trustworthy enterprise decision-making.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

A Before-and-After Effectiveness Assessment of Zero Trust Adoption Using a Risk-Adaptive Score-Based Evaluation Model

This study proposes a risk-adaptive, score-based evaluation model to quantitatively measure security effectiveness before and after the implementation of a Zero Trust security framework. Prior Zero Trust studies have mainly relied on checklist-based approaches that focus on conceptual architectures or maturity levels,...

Kyoungwan Kug, Jongdae Lee, Youngchae Kee et al. · 0 citations
#explainable ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Trust calibration in human-AI collaborative decision-making: a cross-domain investigation of climate intelligence and organisational governance systems

It is found that trust exhibited a non-linear association with AI autonomy, with higher observed trust at intermediate than at maximal levels of delegation; turning regions varied by decision context and should not be interpreted as universal autonomy thresholds.

Elizabeth I. Igbodor, I. Mordi, Ngozi B. Umoru et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Security-by-Governance in DeFi: A Simulation-Based Framework for Staggered Adoption, Tail Risk, and Network Spillovers

Decentralized finance (DeFi) aspires to trust-minimized operation, yet practical resilience depends on governance arrangements that shape assurance, disclosure incentives, incident response, and coordination across interdependent protocols. This study develops and demonstrates a simulation-based empirical framework for...

Amirreza Taheri, Ali Divandari · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Responsible AI Governance in Organizational Decision-Making: A Conceptual Framework of Calibrated Trust, Ethical Acceptability, and Decision Legitimacy.

By functioning in an advisory capacity, AI systems are playing an increasingly central role in organizational decision-making, yet their value cannot be assessed based solely on predictive performance. This article describes the governance-centered conceptual model of how technological governance capability and organiz...

Mohamed Hamza Bennani, Driss Helmi · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Strategic Decision-Making in Management Information Systems: A Critical Review of Transparency, Trust, and Governance Frameworks

The review argues that XAI should not be treated as a technical add-on to predictive modelling; it must be embedded across the complete decision lifecycle through data governance, model documentation, explanation quality controls, stakeholder participation, human oversight and continuous monitoring.

Sampath Kini K · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

From Credit Scoring to Governed Decision Systems: Integrating Predictive Performance, Uncertainty, and Governance

The Calibrated, Adaptive, Knowledge-aware Ensemble for Credit Scoring (CAKE-CS), a structure-aware architecture integrating fold-local dependency representation, heterogeneous experts, sparse routing, cross-fitted stacking, probability calibration, and cross-conformal decisions within a fold-disciplined pipeline, is pr...

Nasser Khalili, Alireza Saleh Sedghpour, M. Jahanbakht et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 30, 2026

Q&A: Hey AI, who should I vote for this year?

MIT professors Adam Berinsky and Chara Podimata discuss a new project to track how AI chatbots are responding to questions about the 2026 U.S. midterm elections.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.