Skip to content
Book

"Nobody Did This": Contribution, Originality, and Accountability in Agent-Mediated Collaboration

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · 1 citation · 32 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

It is argued that contribution dissolution begins before collaboration itself, in the individual worker’s own uncertainty about what is genuinely theirs, and propagates through collaborative relationships, collapsing the reliability that makes productive intellectual exchange possible.

Abstract

Collaborative knowledge work is changing in ways that go beyond disclosure or transparency. LLM agents are now embedded in how teams research, design, write, and decide: mediating between members, synthesizing inputs, reformulating ideas, and drafting shared outputs. They do not only facilitate collaboration; they operate within the workflow at the moment contributions are being formed. In doing so, they risk undermining the social conditions under which contribution can be witnessed, attributed, and held accountable. This workshop brings together researchers and practitioners to confront what we call contribution dissolution: the blurring of attribution, originality, and accountability in agent-mediated collaborative work. We argue that this dissolution begins before collaboration itself, in the individual worker’s own uncertainty about what is genuinely theirs, and propagates through collaborative relationships, collapsing the reliability that makes productive intellectual exchange possible. Through position statements, mapping exercises, and a hands-on activity, participants will surface how framing accountability as a documentation problem (e.g., AI use statements, watermarking, provenance logs) overlooks the conditions under which accountability is produced. Our goal is to produce a shared research agenda and the foundations of an infrastructural response to contribution dissolution in collaborative knowledge work.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

When No One Owns the Judgment: Accountability Under Contribution Dissolution in Human-AI Collaboration

This work exposes the limits of disclosure rules and provenance records as responses to AI-mediated collaboration and offers three directions for discussion: distinguishing the roles AI plays, identifying judgments that require clear human ownership, and creating conditions in which AI involvement can be disclosed with...

Heng-Zhi Ye · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Beyond the agenda: meetings as foundational to team entitativity, innovation, and effectiveness in scientific contexts

Effective scientific collaboration is essential for addressing society’s most dynamic and interconnected problems, yet the interpersonal and structural processes that foster such collaboration are often undermined by fragmentation and knowledge heterogeneity. While the science of team science has identified the structu...

Deborah DiazGranados, Joseph A. Allen, Anita L. Blanchard · 0 citations
Sep 2026

“Oops, did we include you?” Rethinking PBS through co-production with Steven

This paper aims to share the story of a co-produced functional behaviour assessment (FBA) with Steven, a young man who helped us rethink what it really means to involve someone in their own support. Using observation, data collection and analysis, the authors made the process accessible and collaborative by working...

Sara Silva Neagle, Steven Rowbotham · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

“We would be foolish not to use influencers” – trading off public values in public-sector communication

This study aims to examine how public administrations perceive and govern collaboration with social-media influencers (SMIs), conceptualizing these partnerships as public values trade-offs between platform logics and administrative norms. Drawing on 19 semistructured interviews with social-media managers in...

R. Zumofen, Vincent Mabillard · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Collective sensemaking in interactive value formation: A study of conversational agents

As organizations increasingly integrate conversational agents (CAs) to support their customer-facing and internal processes, the emergent value of these tools seemingly depends less on their technical features than on how actors collectively interpret what the CA is, does, and should become. This study focuses on inter...

Angelo Ranieri, Cristina Mele, Kristina Heinonen · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.