Back to #software testing

Design and Empirical Characterization of a Hardware-Realized Turing Machine with Automated Card-Based Programming

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 7 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Physical implementations of Turing Machines remain rare, and existing electromechanical demonstrators and mechanical logic games typically require manual operator intervention, either to trigger each computational step or to reconfigure the state table, or both. This restricts prior physical models to short, operator-paced demonstrations and prevents autonomous execution of extended computations. This paper addresses that gap with a hardware Turing Machine that enables autonomous multi-step execution and reprogrammable optical input without manual intervention between programs. The system integrates an Arduino Mega for state-transition logic, dual NEMA 17 stepper motors for bidirectional tape actuation, infrared reflectance sensors for symbol detection, and an ESP32-CAM-based optical punched-card reader for automated state-table loading. Hole detection under non-uniform illumination used a Breadth-First Search flood-fill algorithm with local adaptive thresholding rather than fixed global thresholding, driven by the memory and library constraints of the ESP32-CAM's microcontroller environment; this improved card-decoding accuracy from 75% to 90% (100% with mechanical card flattening) on a 20-card test set. Mechanical evaluation showed fabrication accuracy of +/-0.15 mm, rack-and-pinion positional error below 0.3 mm across 50 trials, and voltage supply stability within +/-0.2 V under full system load. End-to-end computation was validated against a parallel software simulator (tlang), with all hardware outputs matching the simulated reference exactly across multiple test programs. The system advances prior physical Turing Machine demonstrations through autonomous execution, reprogrammable optical input, and quantitative evaluation of its mechanical, optical, and computational performance.

View source

Similar papers

#software testing Preprint Aug 2026

Evaluating Inference-Time Defenses Against Package Hallucination in LLM-Generated Code

LLMs are increasingly used for code generation, yet they frequently hallucinate non-existent software packages, creating exploitable entry points into the software supply chain. We make four contributions to this problem. First, we show that prior evaluation methodologies systematically inflate hallucination rates by misclassifying standard-library modules as hallucinations in some languages. For Python, the overestimation reaches 9.4 percentage points. Second, we evaluate seven inference-time defenses for mitigating package hallucinations, including five guided decoding strategies (Greedy, Contrastive, DoLa, Nudging, and Active Layer-Contrastive Decoding), an iterative self-refinement approach (Self-Refine), and a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based defense.. Across eight models spanning five families and four programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Ruby, Rust), RAG reduces the package hallucination rate (PHR) in 18 of 32 model--language configurations. Third, we introduce Package Utility (PU) to assess whether defenses preserve valid and task-relevant recommendations. Among strategies evaluated, Greedy decoding provides the strongest average mitigation--utility trade-off. Fourth, we stress-test all strategies under adversarial prompts seeded with fabricated package names and find that PHR surges by up to 45 percentage points relative to standard prompts, with Ruby consistently the most vulnerable language (80.9--95.2\%). Under adversarial conditions, RAG and Self-Refine outperform all decoding-only strategies, indicating that robust defense requires either external grounding or iterative self-verification when prompts are actively hostile. Our results recast package hallucination as both a measurement problem and a decoding-time control problem, and they demonstrate that the choice of defense must be matched to the threat model and recommendation utility.

Albérick Euraste Djiré, Iyiola E. Olatunji, Melissa Tessa et al. · 1 citation
#software testing Review Aug 2026

ChatGPT Solves All Tested Qiskit Homework Assignments

This study examined whether introductory Qiskit homework could remain autogradable while requiring students to run, review, and discuss results rather than banning AI.

A. Kaltchenko, Gurnivaj Tiwana · 0 citations

Mixed Reality Glasses Image Translocation for Binocular Diplopia.

This prototype MRG image translocation software was helpful to 69% of patients with binocular diplopia, but limited by large angle strabismus because of the limited instrument field of view.

Edsel B Ing, Kevin Sha, Sarosh Dandoti et al. · 0 citations
#software testing Open access Aug 2026

Multi-Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Web-Based Diagnostic Support System for Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Parkinson\'s Disease

A diagnostic support system based on a unified web platform that classifies patients according to the risks of developing three diseases based on regularly collected clinical or audio data using classical supervised learning algorithms is presented.

Vedamurthy D R, Dr. Anup Ritti, A. Bibi et al. · 0 citations
#software testing Open access Aug 2026

GENERALIZABILITY OF CLOUD-BASED AI SOFTWARE FOR ANTERIOR TOOTH SEGMENTATION IN MULTICENTER CBCT DATASETS: AN EXTERNAL VALIDATION STUDY.

The reduced segmentation time and consistent performance across CBCT systems support the potential integration of cloud-based AI segmentation into digital dental workflows, especially for anterior teeth, where accurate morphology is clinically relevant.

Gabriel Cunha Adiverci, Erielma Lomba Dias Julião, A. Leite et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 17, 2026

Q&A: Rethinking how innovation happens

In his latest book, Professor Eugene Fitzgerald examines the forces that turn breakthroughs into value — and why innovation resists simple formulas.