Skip to content

StateAct: Program State, before Pixels, for Long-Horizon Computer-Use Agents

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.22798 · 4 citations · 21 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Grounding action, verification, and memory in state, what the authors call state-grounding, shifts the main bottleneck from perception toward reasoning: failures depend more on what the agent thinks than on what it sees.

Abstract

Computer-use agents are usually improved by strengthening perception: better models for reading a screenshot and choosing where to click. Yet a screenshot is only a lossy rendering of the underlying program state, e.g., the files, application backends, and DOM that hold the task data. Different states can produce the same pixels, while code can inspect and modify that state directly. StateAct is a code-first, multi-agent harness built around this distinction. Its main agent works directly with program state by using code, while a dedicated GUI subagent handles screenshot-and-click interaction on the few subgoals that need it, just 28 of 108 tasks and 1.1% of main-agent steps. The same direct access to program state also supports verification: an independent finish gate double-checks the saved result for structural failures, e.g., output that is missing, unsaved, or written to the wrong path. To stay on track over hundreds of steps, the main agent hands subgoals to fresh subagents, keeping its own context focused. On OSWorld 2.0, StateAct lifts Claude Opus 4.8 from 20.6% to 26.9% on binary success, and from 54.8% to 61.6% on partial success, at ~ 9x lower cost per task than the same model driven by screenshots alone; a code-only variant with no GUI subagent reaches only 45.9% partial, below that screenshot-based baseline's 54.8%. In general, grounding action, verification, and memory in state, what we call state-grounding, shifts the main bottleneck from perception toward reasoning: failures depend more on what the agent thinks than on what it sees.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

ASIL: Replacing Screenshot-and-Click with Structured State and Semantic Actions

This work introduces ASIL (Agent-Software Interaction Layer), an agent-native interface that exposes software through structured JSON observations and code-executable semantic actions, realized through the deepest feasible access path for each application.

Rui Xie, Lu Chen · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Encore: Few-Shot Agentic Discovery of Manipulation Strategies

This work introduces ENCORE, which gives the agent a few demonstrations as evidence to read rather than as training data, and shows that on RoboDojo tasks whose instructions leave the goal unstated, no program succeeds without demonstrations.

Yi-Fan Kang, Zihan Wang, Zhi-Wen Fan et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

How Strongly Should Task State Influence an LLM Agent?

Across three models, two reasoning regimes, and two domains, four findings hold without per-turn reasoning: displaying accurate state is unreliable, an unverified ledger the agent writes itself beats an accurate checklist it is shown, directives help in proportion to the model's obedience, and enforcement needs no obed...

C. Zhang, Wonbin Kweon, Jia-Wei Han · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

SAGE: Symbolic Action-Gating and Editing for LLM Task Planners

SAGE (Symbolic Action-Gating and Editing), a single-LLM planner built from two lightweight mechanisms: a domain-agnostic symbolic gate that blocks precondition-violating actions with typed reasons as a runtime safety monitor, and a local edit that regenerates only the failed sub-goal's suffix, keeping completed and unt...

T. Bui, Jongsul Moon, Youngouk Kim et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Self-Evolving Coding Agents: From Digital Programs to Physical-World Intelligence

Vision-language-action (VLA) and world-action (WAM) models map observations and instructions directly to robot actions. This directness ties a policy to training: minor layout or viewpoint changes cause failure, and instructions generalize poorly. The root cause lies in representation: task requirements, conditions, pr...

Hong-Cheng Gao, Jing-Jing Zhou, Ze Zheng et al. · 4 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

From Rollout to Reset: A Graph-Based Harness for Autonomous Long-Horizon Manipulation Evaluation

HALTER, a Harness for Autonomous Long-horizon Task Evaluation and Reset, which restores the scene by planning over a library of learned atomic reset skills, so demonstration cost scales with the size of that library rather than with the number of terminal states.

Jing Jiang, Yue Yang, Xin-Kai Jiang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.