Aug 2026· Journal of Consumer Affairs· 0 citations· 103 references
Abstract
With the prevalence of emerging technologies, brands are increasingly using generative artificial intelligence (AI) to craft branding messages, including those reflecting sociopolitical views through brand activism. Although generative AI is effective in content creation, its use in value‐laden contexts may differentially alter individual affective responses, thereby impacting consumer well‐being. We address this gap by examining how AI‐created brand activism messages influence consumers' negative affect and decision comfort. Across five studies, we find that AI‐created activism elicits greater negative affect, ultimately reducing decision comfort. This occurs because consumers perceive these messages as less authentic. This effect attenuates when consumers are conservative (vs. liberal) or have a high tendency to anthropomorphize AI. This work advances the literature on brand activism, generative AI, and consumer affect by clarifying how AI use in brand activism reshapes consumers' emotional and decisional experiences and offering insights into how brands can effectively navigate such sociopolitical communication.
The adoption of generative artificial intelligence among communication practitioners and researchers surged after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, urging practitioners to critically engage in exploring pathways for fostering socially responsible and environmentally sustainable AI practices.
Clinical nurses' GenAI learning needs are currently oriented toward practical, application-focused skills, and curriculum development may benefit from a phased approach that prioritizes high-impact practical skills while progressively incorporating foundational, ethical, and advanced competencies.
Yeru Xia, Jingbang Liu, Kaili Wang et al.· Nurse Education Today· 1 citation· ⚡1
It is argued that both AI and bullshitters are untrustworthy informants, and for similar reasons, it is natural to describe AI’s informational outputs as bullshit, as it signals their distinctive kind of epistemic deficiencies, which they share with bullshit.
A new method for surgically removing training examples from a model reveals that as datasets grow, the link between what a model learns and what it produces dissolves.