Back to #generative ai

Generative AI and digital transformation in organizational roadmaps: employee value perceptions and knowledge sharing

Aug 2026 · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · 0 citations · 53 references

Abstract

This study explains how employees translate the day-to-day value they derive from generative artificial intelligence (GAI) into employees' perceived insider status and knowledge sharing behavior. Integrating the job demands–resources theory, we theorize four value perceptions of GAI, functional, epistemic, conditional and emotional, as distinct socio-cognitive cues from which employees infer perceived insider status. A cross-sectional survey design was employed using a structured questionnaire administered to employees across multiple industries where GAI is embedded in daily work practices. The final sample consisted of 298 valid responses, and the proposed relationships were tested using covariance-based structural equation modeling, including mediation and moderation analyses. We found that emotional value is positively associated with perceived insider status, conditional value is negatively associated with perceived insider status, and functional and epistemic value show no direct associations. Perceived insider status predicts greater knowledge sharing, which in turn is linked to stronger commitment, more citizenship behavior, deeper identification and lower alienation. Knowledge of artificial intelligence strengthens the associations of functional and emotional value with perceived insider status, and weakens the association of conditional value with perceived insider status. The findings re-orient technology value theorizing toward socioemotional inclusion, identify perceived insider status as a proximal mechanism connecting everyday GAI experiences to cooperative behavior, and specify knowledge of artificial intelligence as a capability amplifier that shapes how value cues are read as signals of membership. Practical guidance follows for embedding GAI in routine workflows, investing in literacy and designing for emotionally positive user experiences.

View source

Similar papers

#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

The socio-ecological costs of AI: Toward socially responsible and sustainable communication practices

The adoption of generative artificial intelligence among communication practitioners and researchers surged after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, urging practitioners to critically engage in exploring pathways for fostering socially responsible and environmentally sustainable AI practices.

Emma Christensen · 4 citations · ⚡1
#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Toward an AI-integrated nursing curriculum: A Kano model analysis of generative AI competency needs.

Clinical nurses' GenAI learning needs are currently oriented toward practical, application-focused skills, and curriculum development may benefit from a phased approach that prioritizes high-impact practical skills while progressively incorporating foundational, ethical, and advanced competencies.

Yeru Xia, Jingbang Liu, Kaili Wang et al. · 1 citation · ⚡1
#generative ai Aug 2026

AI and Bullshit

It is argued that both AI and bullshitters are untrustworthy informants, and for similar reasons, it is natural to describe AI’s informational outputs as bullshit, as it signals their distinctive kind of epistemic deficiencies, which they share with bullshit.

Duncan Pritchard · 1 citation

Related blog posts