Skip to content

PEARL: Auditable Repair for Scientific Reasoning Graph Extraction

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.17917 · 0 citations · 19 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

PEARL (Peircean Extraction via Abstraction and Repair Layer), a training-free framework that turns noisy LLM graph responses into auditable reasoning graphs and repairs them toward strict semantic validity, is proposed.

Abstract

Scientific Reasoning Graph Extraction (SRGE) aims to recover explicit links among observations, evidence, intermediate claims, and paper-level conclusions. LLMs can produce graph-like scientific explanations, but their outputs often mix malformed syntax, drifting edge labels, incorrectly oriented roots, and weak source anchors. We propose PEARL (Peircean Extraction via Abstraction and Repair Layer), a training-free framework that turns noisy LLM graph responses into auditable reasoning graphs and repairs them toward strict semantic validity. PEARL first materializes explicit graph content under a closed Peircean schema, then uses matched evidence-grounded judge feedback to repair rejected edge types, local inference steps, and terminal roots while preserving an audit trail. On five 70-paper model archives from ARCHE, a benchmark for latent reasoning-chain extraction, PEARL raises strict gate passes from 0/350 for the LLM baseline to 300/350, with average REA improving from 0.339 to 0.906. The graphs provide a reliability layer for research-agent and AI scientist workflows that need inspectable reasoning traces rather than unconstrained graph regeneration. Code and audit artifacts are available at https://github.com/BohanSu/auditable-repair-reasoning-graphs/tree/300-350_workshop .

View source

Similar papers

Finding Icebergs in Language-Model Workflow: Diagnosing Latent Structural Fragility with Stochastic Semantic Evidence Graphs

AI-workflow governance cannot be reduced to checking the final answer: an apparently safe answer may rest on a fragile evidence path that ordinary evaluation cannot see, localize or govern, so SSEG moves governance below surface-level output checking into auditable, path-specific decisions about intervention, revalidat...

M. Dixon, Bertrand Nortier, Miquel Noguer I. Alonso · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Evidence-Carrying Validation for Knowledge Graphs

This work presents an evidence-carrying validation interface: every selected node-shape check returns either a satisfaction trace or failure witness, and shows how programs combine passing and failing evidence to diagnose missing information and guide repair.

Gabe Fierro · 0 citations
Open access 2026

EviGraphRAG: Constraint-Verified Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering over Event Knowledge Graphs

EviGraphRAG is proposed, a ranker-agnostic reliability layer that separates candidate ranking from exact verification and explicit abstention, and exact conjunction over represented event constraints and linked source-record connectivity can improve selective reliability, while parser quality and candidate retrieval re...

Yu-Teng Sun, Yang Su, Xu-An Wang · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

TRACE-Chem: Symmetry-Aware Counterfactual Reasoning over Typed Evidence Graphs for Verifiable Multimodal Chemical Record Extraction

Examining relational symmetry and asymmetry improves verifiability, calibration, and repair safety in multimodal chemical extraction and improves verifiability, calibration, and repair safety in multimodal chemical extraction.

Jia-Qi Liu, Changshuai Wang, Hanshen Li · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Grounded and Faithful P&ID Reasoning: Constraining Vision-Language Models with Recovered Evidence Graphs

Graph-Grounded Harness (The authors') recovers an explicit graph of the drawing---its symbols, the process connections between them, and the tags that name them---and then requires the model to answer only by querying that graph through seven read-only operators, so a topology claim is returned only when it cites the q...

P. Gadekar, Sagar Srinivas Sakhinana, Venkataramana Runkana · 0 citations

Diagnostic Knowledge Graphs: Automated Benchmark Construction and Deterministic Evaluation for Multi-Step Reasoning Agents

It is argued that building reproducible diagnostic benchmarks and building effective diagnostic agents are dual problems solved by the same artifact —a canonical knowledge structure that normalizes evaluation gold-standards and constrains agent hypothesis spaces simultaneously.

Unknown authors · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.