Aug 2026· Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering· 0 citations· 7 references
TL;DR
RA-QGQA is presented, which recasts triple verification as a question-driven, corpus-grounded task, and demonstrates RA-QGQA as an interactive web system in which users import a KG and its source corpus, verify all triples in a single pass, and inspect the passages that justify its verdict.
Abstract
LLM-driven construction can populate a knowledge graph (KG) with large volumes of triples extracted from documents, yet hallucination leaves their quality far from guaranteed. Existing verification methods return only a single label, one that fails to indicate which part of the triple is at fault and offers no evidence to check against. We present RA-QGQA, which recasts triple verification as a question-driven, corpus-grounded task. For each triple, a Question Generation (QG) module poses one question per slot (head, relation, and tail); a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Question Answering (QA) module retrieves from the corpus and answers each independently; the answers are then matched against the triple to reach a verdict. The verdict pinpoints the faulty slot and carries a passage-level evidence chain the user can trace back to the source. We demonstrate RA-QGQA as an interactive web system in which users import a KG and its source corpus, verify all triples in a single pass, and, for any flagged triple, inspect the passages that justify its verdict. The system thus turns large-scale KG verification into a scalable, evidence-backed process.
GraphQAG effectively supports users in identifying knowledge coverage gaps, examining generated QA pairs, and refining the QA pair set through graph-based interactions, demonstrating the usefulness of combining knowledge graphs, LLM-based generation, and visual analytics for producing more comprehensive and trustworthy...
Yize Li, Ruiqi Yu, Tianya Pan et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
KGCaRe is proposed, a hybrid approach that combines neural retrieval with symbolic reasoning over LLM-generated KGs that consistently outperforms existing baselines, including Vanilla LLM, Code Prompt, Text Prompt, Think-on-Graph, Vanilla RAG, and HybridContextQA.
Ghanshyam Verma, Sima Sarkar, Devishree Pillai et al.· 0 citations
Results indicate that integrating multi-source domain knowledge with relation-preserved retrieval and attribute-supported filtering provides more focused and inspectable evidence, thereby supporting more accurate complex material question answering.
Peize Li, Xi Guo, Nan Yin et al.· Electronics· 0 citations
By evaluating paper retrieval, evidence grounding, and answer accuracy separately, LitTraceQA provides a testbed for scientific QA systems that produce verifiable answers rather than unsupported summaries.
Evaluations on standard KBQA benchmarks show that the proposed ARI-KBQA enhances model performance with a reduced search space, especially in complex multi-hop query scenarios.
Jian-Qi Gao, Hang Yu, Jian Cao et al.· 0 citations
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems commonly operate on text extracted from documents, potentially losing information contained in figures, tables, layout, and relationships distributed across passages. We present an explainable multimodal graph-RAG architecture that augments a text-only baseline with LLM-extr...
Sokipriala Jonah· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.