Aug 2026· Applied Sciences· 1 citation· 86 references
Abstract
This paper presents a unified technical survey of Large Language Models (LLMs), connecting three layers of the modelling pipeline that existing surveys address in isolation: internal architecture, distributed training optimisation, and downstream adaptation. Its organising principle is the dependency between these layers—how a choice at one constrains what remains feasible at the next. The survey examines fundamental mechanisms (tokenisation, scaled dot-product attention, activation functions, and normalisation, including RMSNorm and pre- versus post-normalisation placement), then the engineering of training at scale: data, tensor, and pipeline parallelism, hybrid schemes, mixed-precision training with BF16 and FP8, ZeRO-Offload memory management, activation checkpointing, and compute-optimal scaling laws together with the conditions under which they fail. The adaptation section covers supervised and instruction fine-tuning, a comparison of parameter-efficient methods (LoRA, QLoRA, adapters, prefix and prompt tuning), Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with its reward-hacking failure mode, alternatives including DPO, KTO and Constitutional AI, Retrieval-Augmented Generation beyond the basic pipeline, and decoding strategies. Practical configuration guidance is given for 7B, 70B and trillion-parameter regimes. Dedicated treatments of Mixture-of-Experts architectures, long-context modelling, and hardware-aware co-design close the survey, with open challenges classified by origin and severity.
This work systematize the RL-for-LLM paradigm and provides a compute-centric analysis of prominent post-training algorithmic frameworks: Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), as well as their variants, and develops a taxonomy of intra- and inter-model parallelism strategies for...
Maciej Besta, L. Schmidt, Lara Nonino et al.· 0 citations
Performance consistently improves from conventional single-policy PEFT to multi-policy PEFT, with the proposed automatic multi-policy framework achieving the best performance under the same trainable capacity, suggesting that optimization-path organization is more effective than simply increasing adapter capacity for h...
Jia-Jia Tang, Si-Zhe Yuen, Francisco Gomez Medina et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
Comparison of GPT-4, BERT (bidirectional encoder representations from transformers), Gemini, and DeepSeek large language models (LLM), focusing on architectures, training methodologies, and real-world applications reveals GPT-4 excels in natural language generation and complex reasoning, supporting up to 128K tokens wi...
Kavish Sanghvi, Aparna S. Sharma, Surbhi Hooda· Computer Science and Informa...· 0 citations
Large Language Models (LLMs) trained using Chain-of-Thought (CoT) supervision have achieved state-of-the-art performance on complex reasoning tasks. However, the generation of long reasoning chains introduces substantial computational overhead during inference, limiting their deployment in low-latency and resource-cons...
V. A, Mithaguru, Amrita Kundu et al.· 2026 4th International Confe...· 0 citations
A systematic literature review on how RL are adapted and scaled as a fundamental post-training tools and how innovations in the RL pipeline enhance the domain-specific LLMs is conducted.
Qianyue Hao, Lin Chen, Xiao-Qian Qi et al.· ACM Computing Surveys· 1 citation
Rules-Injected Instruction Tuning (RuleGPT), a paradigm that injects IF–THEN rules extracted from training data directly into the LLM's instruction sequence, allows the LLM to focus on higher-order, context-dependent interactions.
Weihao Jiang, Huizhao Wang, Zhihui Hu et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.