This work investigates a method for automatically detecting inconsistencies in Task-Oriented Dialogues by conceptualizing TODs as a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP), where variables represent dialogue segments referencing the conversational domain and constraints among variables capture dialogue properties such as turn coherence and adherence to domain knowledge.
Abstract
Generative AI is profoundly transforming the core technologies behind conversational systems, shifting from component-based to end-to-end approaches. However, Large Language Models (LLMs) may still generate inconsistencies, a critical issue particularly in Task-Oriented Dialogues (TODs), where system responses must strictly adhere to information from a domain knowledge base (e.g., restaurants in a city). A single hallucination (e.g., suggesting a non-existent restaurant) can lead to severe task failures. We investigate a method for automatically detecting inconsistencies by conceptualizing TODs as a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP), where variables represent dialogue segments referencing the conversational domain, and constraints among variables capture dialogue properties such as turn coherence and adherence to domain knowledge. We propose a pipeline that first identifies variables in a target dialogue and then applies a CSP solver to identify valid solutions. By comparing the target dialogue with valid variable assignments, we can detect inconsistencies and suggest minimal changes to ensure dialogue consistency. We demonstrate the high accuracy of the CSP-based approach in detecting inconsistencies, and provide a detailed analysis of our findings.
GSC-QA (Goal-based Sequential Conversation QA), a framework that integrates three complementary components into a unified enterprise dialogue architecture that combines retrieval, instruction enforcement, and goal persistence in a single coordinated loop built on LangGraph, is introduced.
A new benchmark, KIFI, is designed, which comprises 1032 carefully selected instances from the TRUE and ScreenEval datasets, with key information annotated, and it is shown that LLMs frequently fail to use the appropriate information to make correct decisions.
Xindi Guo, Zhen Xie, Patrick H. Chen· Annual International ACM SIG...· 0 citations
This work makes IoA detectable by generating diagnostic multiple-choice questions whose divergent answers across participants provide direct behavioral evidence of hidden disagreement, and pairs IoA-Prober-8B with LLM agents improves downstream task performance on BigCodeBench-Hard and HiddenBench.
Kai Liu, Fuwen Luo, Ziyue Wang et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes a pipeline that leverage LLMs as safety detector, editor and evaluator to mitigate undesired behaviour in human-computer dialogues and shows reduction in the unsafe dialogues after revision.
T. Ajayi, M. Arcan, P. Buitelaar· WOCHAT2026: Workshop on Chat...· 0 citations
This work discovers persona-centric metamorphic relations to infer test samples from annotated data, without additional annotation cost, and evaluates the robustness of personalized dialogue models regarding persona consistency, revealing that prompt learning is more robust than training from scratch and fine-tuning.
Lin Li, Xiaohua Wu, Yanbing Chen et al.· Cognitive Computation· 0 citations
AnthroDial is presented, a closed-loop framework that formulates anthropomorphic dialogue as a joint problem of system architecture, executable evaluation, and diagnostic alignment and shows that anthropomorphic dialogue benefits when generation, evaluation, and reward shaping share the same behavioral dimensions.
Wentao Liu, Si-Yu Song, Xi Chen et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.